3D position estimation of flexible instruments: marker-less and marker-based methods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Endoscopic images can be used to allow accurate flexible endoscopic instrument control. This can be implemented using a pose estimation algorithm, which estimates the actual instrument pose from the endoscopic images. Methods In this paper, two pose estimation algorithms are compared: a marker-less and a marker-based method. The marker-based method uses the positions of three markers in the endoscopic image to update the state of a kinematic model of the endoscopic instrument. The marker-less method works similarly, but uses the positions of three feature points instead of the positions of markers. The algorithms are evaluated inside a colon model. The endoscopic instrument is manually operated, while an X-ray imager is used to obtain a ground-truth reference position. Results The marker-less method achieves an RMS error of 1.5, 1.6, and 1.8 mm in the horizontal, vertical, and away-from-camera directions, respectively. The marker-based method achieves an RMS error of 1.1, 1.7, and 1.5 mm in the horizontal, vertical, and away-from-camera directions, respectively. The differences between the two methods are not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions The proposed algorithms are suitable to realize accurate robotic control of flexible endoscopic instruments, enabling the physician to perform advanced procedures in an intuitive way.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)407-417
Number of pages11
JournalInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2013

Keywords

  • EWI-24594
  • IR-89832
  • METIS-304030

Cite this

@article{13869afb29284b11b2c77148b42dc054,
title = "3D position estimation of flexible instruments: marker-less and marker-based methods",
abstract = "Purpose Endoscopic images can be used to allow accurate flexible endoscopic instrument control. This can be implemented using a pose estimation algorithm, which estimates the actual instrument pose from the endoscopic images. Methods In this paper, two pose estimation algorithms are compared: a marker-less and a marker-based method. The marker-based method uses the positions of three markers in the endoscopic image to update the state of a kinematic model of the endoscopic instrument. The marker-less method works similarly, but uses the positions of three feature points instead of the positions of markers. The algorithms are evaluated inside a colon model. The endoscopic instrument is manually operated, while an X-ray imager is used to obtain a ground-truth reference position. Results The marker-less method achieves an RMS error of 1.5, 1.6, and 1.8 mm in the horizontal, vertical, and away-from-camera directions, respectively. The marker-based method achieves an RMS error of 1.1, 1.7, and 1.5 mm in the horizontal, vertical, and away-from-camera directions, respectively. The differences between the two methods are not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions The proposed algorithms are suitable to realize accurate robotic control of flexible endoscopic instruments, enabling the physician to perform advanced procedures in an intuitive way.",
keywords = "EWI-24594, IR-89832, METIS-304030",
author = "Rob Reilink and Stefano Stramigioli and Sarthak Misra",
note = "eemcs-eprint-24594",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11548-012-0795-1",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "8",
pages = "407--417",
journal = "International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery",
issn = "1861-6410",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

3D position estimation of flexible instruments: marker-less and marker-based methods. / Reilink, Rob; Stramigioli, Stefano; Misra, Sarthak.

In: International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, Vol. 8, No. 3, 03.07.2013, p. 407-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - 3D position estimation of flexible instruments: marker-less and marker-based methods

AU - Reilink, Rob

AU - Stramigioli, Stefano

AU - Misra, Sarthak

N1 - eemcs-eprint-24594

PY - 2013/7/3

Y1 - 2013/7/3

N2 - Purpose Endoscopic images can be used to allow accurate flexible endoscopic instrument control. This can be implemented using a pose estimation algorithm, which estimates the actual instrument pose from the endoscopic images. Methods In this paper, two pose estimation algorithms are compared: a marker-less and a marker-based method. The marker-based method uses the positions of three markers in the endoscopic image to update the state of a kinematic model of the endoscopic instrument. The marker-less method works similarly, but uses the positions of three feature points instead of the positions of markers. The algorithms are evaluated inside a colon model. The endoscopic instrument is manually operated, while an X-ray imager is used to obtain a ground-truth reference position. Results The marker-less method achieves an RMS error of 1.5, 1.6, and 1.8 mm in the horizontal, vertical, and away-from-camera directions, respectively. The marker-based method achieves an RMS error of 1.1, 1.7, and 1.5 mm in the horizontal, vertical, and away-from-camera directions, respectively. The differences between the two methods are not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions The proposed algorithms are suitable to realize accurate robotic control of flexible endoscopic instruments, enabling the physician to perform advanced procedures in an intuitive way.

AB - Purpose Endoscopic images can be used to allow accurate flexible endoscopic instrument control. This can be implemented using a pose estimation algorithm, which estimates the actual instrument pose from the endoscopic images. Methods In this paper, two pose estimation algorithms are compared: a marker-less and a marker-based method. The marker-based method uses the positions of three markers in the endoscopic image to update the state of a kinematic model of the endoscopic instrument. The marker-less method works similarly, but uses the positions of three feature points instead of the positions of markers. The algorithms are evaluated inside a colon model. The endoscopic instrument is manually operated, while an X-ray imager is used to obtain a ground-truth reference position. Results The marker-less method achieves an RMS error of 1.5, 1.6, and 1.8 mm in the horizontal, vertical, and away-from-camera directions, respectively. The marker-based method achieves an RMS error of 1.1, 1.7, and 1.5 mm in the horizontal, vertical, and away-from-camera directions, respectively. The differences between the two methods are not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions The proposed algorithms are suitable to realize accurate robotic control of flexible endoscopic instruments, enabling the physician to perform advanced procedures in an intuitive way.

KW - EWI-24594

KW - IR-89832

KW - METIS-304030

U2 - 10.1007/s11548-012-0795-1

DO - 10.1007/s11548-012-0795-1

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 407

EP - 417

JO - International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery

JF - International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery

SN - 1861-6410

IS - 3

ER -