TY - BOOK
T1 - A Challenge-Based Expriment Aiming to Develop Strategic Thinking
T2 - An Inquiry into the Role of Stimulating Creativity for Out-of-the-Box Thinking
AU - Stek, Klaas
N1 - SUTQ Report 2021-2023
PY - 2024/6/14
Y1 - 2024/6/14
N2 - In my SUTQ study, I elaborate that universities must adapt to 21st-century challenges by integrating learning objectives, didactics, and assessments that develop engineering and business students’ higher-order thinking skills, particularly creativity and strategic thinking. The Erasmus+ Project PERFECT, which I participated in, highlighted the importance of creativity, interpersonal skills and intrapersonal attitudes. I could include these in my Industry Engineering and Management masters course, Purchasing Management. I surveyed the students in the cohorts from 2018 until 2024 before and after the course on 36 “soft skills”. Individual students could see their progress, and I could show evidence that “soft skills” can be activated. Educators should understand that teaching and assessing creativity differs from traditional cognitive objectives, requiring students to be result-driven, open to new experiences, and curious. Necessary traits for creativity include curiosity, intuition, playfulness, and risk-taking, while the course must be attractive and stimulate a willingness to learn. Evidence suggests creativity is essential for strategic thinking, with anxiety being a significant barrier. Direct links between analytical and strategic thinking were not found. However, an indirect relationship via creativity was established. In other words, to think out of the box, students must be able to believe in the box, i.e., analyse the problem. However, in-the-box doesn’t lead directly to out-of-the-box for complex problem-solving. Therefore, “creativity” is needed. A creativity workshop and real-life problem-solving assignments shifted education from teacher- to student-centred, showing improvements in creativity and strategic thinking. The study emphasises the need for student-centred approaches, differentiating between knowledge, skills, and attitudes and focusing on active, “knowledge-producing” roles over passive, “knowledge-consuming” ones. Courses should activate students from the start with challenge-based assignments and interactive lectures to enhance understanding and engagement.
AB - In my SUTQ study, I elaborate that universities must adapt to 21st-century challenges by integrating learning objectives, didactics, and assessments that develop engineering and business students’ higher-order thinking skills, particularly creativity and strategic thinking. The Erasmus+ Project PERFECT, which I participated in, highlighted the importance of creativity, interpersonal skills and intrapersonal attitudes. I could include these in my Industry Engineering and Management masters course, Purchasing Management. I surveyed the students in the cohorts from 2018 until 2024 before and after the course on 36 “soft skills”. Individual students could see their progress, and I could show evidence that “soft skills” can be activated. Educators should understand that teaching and assessing creativity differs from traditional cognitive objectives, requiring students to be result-driven, open to new experiences, and curious. Necessary traits for creativity include curiosity, intuition, playfulness, and risk-taking, while the course must be attractive and stimulate a willingness to learn. Evidence suggests creativity is essential for strategic thinking, with anxiety being a significant barrier. Direct links between analytical and strategic thinking were not found. However, an indirect relationship via creativity was established. In other words, to think out of the box, students must be able to believe in the box, i.e., analyse the problem. However, in-the-box doesn’t lead directly to out-of-the-box for complex problem-solving. Therefore, “creativity” is needed. A creativity workshop and real-life problem-solving assignments shifted education from teacher- to student-centred, showing improvements in creativity and strategic thinking. The study emphasises the need for student-centred approaches, differentiating between knowledge, skills, and attitudes and focusing on active, “knowledge-producing” roles over passive, “knowledge-consuming” ones. Courses should activate students from the start with challenge-based assignments and interactive lectures to enhance understanding and engagement.
KW - Purchasing
KW - Education
KW - Personal skills
KW - Competencies
KW - Creativity
KW - Strategic thinking
M3 - Report
BT - A Challenge-Based Expriment Aiming to Develop Strategic Thinking
PB - University of Twente
CY - Enschede
ER -