A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques?

Roelf J. Wieringa, Neil Maiden, Nancy Mead, Colette Rolland

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discussion of a paper in RE program committees is often complicated by lack of agreement about evaluation criteria to be applied to the paper. For some years now, successive program chairs have attempted to increase clarity by including a paper classification in their CFP, and making the evaluation criteria per paper class explicit. This short note presents a paper classification based on this experience. It can be used as guide by program chairs. It can also be used by authors as well as reviewers to understand what kind of paper they are writing or reviewing, and what criteria should be applied in evaluating the paper.
Original languageUndefined
Title of host publicationCERE05
EditorsA. Hickey, V. Cervasi
Place of PublicationSydney
PublisherUniversity of Technology, Sydney
Pages15-18
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)1-86365-868-8
Publication statusPublished - 29 Aug 2005
EventThird International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE 2005 - Paris, France
Duration: 29 Aug 200529 Aug 2005
Conference number: 3
http://www.di.unipi.it/CERE05/

Publication series

Name
PublisherFaculty of Information technology, University of Technology, Sydney

Workshop

WorkshopThird International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE 2005
Abbreviated titleCERE
CountryFrance
CityParis
Period29/08/0529/08/05
Internet address

Keywords

  • IR-64229
  • METIS-227466
  • IS-Design science methodology
  • SCS-Services
  • EWI-10631

Cite this

Wieringa, R. J., Maiden, N., Mead, N., & Rolland, C. (2005). A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques? In A. Hickey, & V. Cervasi (Eds.), CERE05 (pp. 15-18). Sydney: University of Technology, Sydney.
Wieringa, Roelf J. ; Maiden, Neil ; Mead, Nancy ; Rolland, Colette. / A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques?. CERE05. editor / A. Hickey ; V. Cervasi. Sydney : University of Technology, Sydney, 2005. pp. 15-18
@inproceedings{cd8650d775354c889c878384598b2480,
title = "A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques?",
abstract = "Discussion of a paper in RE program committees is often complicated by lack of agreement about evaluation criteria to be applied to the paper. For some years now, successive program chairs have attempted to increase clarity by including a paper classification in their CFP, and making the evaluation criteria per paper class explicit. This short note presents a paper classification based on this experience. It can be used as guide by program chairs. It can also be used by authors as well as reviewers to understand what kind of paper they are writing or reviewing, and what criteria should be applied in evaluating the paper.",
keywords = "IR-64229, METIS-227466, IS-Design science methodology, SCS-Services, EWI-10631",
author = "Wieringa, {Roelf J.} and Neil Maiden and Nancy Mead and Colette Rolland",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "29",
language = "Undefined",
isbn = "1-86365-868-8",
publisher = "University of Technology, Sydney",
pages = "15--18",
editor = "A. Hickey and V. Cervasi",
booktitle = "CERE05",
address = "Australia",

}

Wieringa, RJ, Maiden, N, Mead, N & Rolland, C 2005, A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques? in A Hickey & V Cervasi (eds), CERE05. University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney, pp. 15-18, Third International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE 2005, Paris, France, 29/08/05.

A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques? / Wieringa, Roelf J.; Maiden, Neil; Mead, Nancy; Rolland, Colette.

CERE05. ed. / A. Hickey; V. Cervasi. Sydney : University of Technology, Sydney, 2005. p. 15-18.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques?

AU - Wieringa, Roelf J.

AU - Maiden, Neil

AU - Mead, Nancy

AU - Rolland, Colette

PY - 2005/8/29

Y1 - 2005/8/29

N2 - Discussion of a paper in RE program committees is often complicated by lack of agreement about evaluation criteria to be applied to the paper. For some years now, successive program chairs have attempted to increase clarity by including a paper classification in their CFP, and making the evaluation criteria per paper class explicit. This short note presents a paper classification based on this experience. It can be used as guide by program chairs. It can also be used by authors as well as reviewers to understand what kind of paper they are writing or reviewing, and what criteria should be applied in evaluating the paper.

AB - Discussion of a paper in RE program committees is often complicated by lack of agreement about evaluation criteria to be applied to the paper. For some years now, successive program chairs have attempted to increase clarity by including a paper classification in their CFP, and making the evaluation criteria per paper class explicit. This short note presents a paper classification based on this experience. It can be used as guide by program chairs. It can also be used by authors as well as reviewers to understand what kind of paper they are writing or reviewing, and what criteria should be applied in evaluating the paper.

KW - IR-64229

KW - METIS-227466

KW - IS-Design science methodology

KW - SCS-Services

KW - EWI-10631

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 1-86365-868-8

SP - 15

EP - 18

BT - CERE05

A2 - Hickey, A.

A2 - Cervasi, V.

PB - University of Technology, Sydney

CY - Sydney

ER -

Wieringa RJ, Maiden N, Mead N, Rolland C. A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques? In Hickey A, Cervasi V, editors, CERE05. Sydney: University of Technology, Sydney. 2005. p. 15-18