Abstract
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | CERE05 |
| Editors | A. Hickey, V. Cervasi |
| Place of Publication | Sydney |
| Publisher | University of Technology, Sydney |
| Pages | 15-18 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISBN (Print) | 1-86365-868-8 |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Aug 2005 |
| Event | Third International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE 2005 - Paris, France Duration: 29 Aug 2005 → 29 Aug 2005 Conference number: 3 http://www.di.unipi.it/CERE05/ |
Publication series
| Name | |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Faculty of Information technology, University of Technology, Sydney |
Workshop
| Workshop | Third International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE 2005 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | CERE |
| Country | France |
| City | Paris |
| Period | 29/08/05 → 29/08/05 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- IR-64229
- METIS-227466
- IS-Design science methodology
- SCS-Services
- EWI-10631
Cite this
}
A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques? / Wieringa, Roelf J.; Maiden, Neil; Mead, Nancy; Rolland, Colette.
CERE05. ed. / A. Hickey; V. Cervasi. Sydney : University of Technology, Sydney, 2005. p. 15-18.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review
TY - GEN
T1 - A classification of RE papers:(A)re we researching or designing RE techniques?
AU - Wieringa, Roelf J.
AU - Maiden, Neil
AU - Mead, Nancy
AU - Rolland, Colette
PY - 2005/8/29
Y1 - 2005/8/29
N2 - Discussion of a paper in RE program committees is often complicated by lack of agreement about evaluation criteria to be applied to the paper. For some years now, successive program chairs have attempted to increase clarity by including a paper classification in their CFP, and making the evaluation criteria per paper class explicit. This short note presents a paper classification based on this experience. It can be used as guide by program chairs. It can also be used by authors as well as reviewers to understand what kind of paper they are writing or reviewing, and what criteria should be applied in evaluating the paper.
AB - Discussion of a paper in RE program committees is often complicated by lack of agreement about evaluation criteria to be applied to the paper. For some years now, successive program chairs have attempted to increase clarity by including a paper classification in their CFP, and making the evaluation criteria per paper class explicit. This short note presents a paper classification based on this experience. It can be used as guide by program chairs. It can also be used by authors as well as reviewers to understand what kind of paper they are writing or reviewing, and what criteria should be applied in evaluating the paper.
KW - IR-64229
KW - METIS-227466
KW - IS-Design science methodology
KW - SCS-Services
KW - EWI-10631
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 1-86365-868-8
SP - 15
EP - 18
BT - CERE05
A2 - Hickey, A.
A2 - Cervasi, V.
PB - University of Technology, Sydney
CY - Sydney
ER -