Abstract
Discussion of a paper in RE program committees is often
complicated by lack of agreement about evaluation criteria
to be applied to the paper. For some years now, successive
program chairs have attempted to increase clarity by
including a paper classification in their CFP, and making the
evaluation criteria per paper class explicit. This short note
presents a paper classification based on this experience. It
can be used as guide by program chairs. It can also be used
by authors as well as reviewers to understand what kind of
paper they are writing or reviewing, and what criteria should
be applied in evaluating the paper.
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | CERE05 |
| Editors | A. Hickey, V. Cervasi |
| Place of Publication | Sydney |
| Publisher | University of Technology Sydney |
| Pages | 15-18 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISBN (Print) | 1-86365-868-8 |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Aug 2005 |
| Event | Third International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE 2005 - Paris, France Duration: 29 Aug 2005 → 29 Aug 2005 Conference number: 3 http://www.di.unipi.it/CERE05/ |
Publication series
| Name | |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Faculty of Information technology, University of Technology, Sydney |
Workshop
| Workshop | Third International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE 2005 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | CERE |
| Country | France |
| City | Paris |
| Period | 29/08/05 → 29/08/05 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- IR-64229
- METIS-227466
- IS-Design science methodology
- SCS-Services
- EWI-10631