A comparison between optimisation algorithms for metal forming processes

M.H.A. Bonte; D.T.D. Do; L. Fourment; Antonius H. van den Boogaard; Han Huetink; A. Habbal

A comparison between optimisation algorithms for metal forming processes

M.H.A. Bonte, D.T.D. Do, L. Fourment, Antonius H. van den Boogaard, Han Huetink, A. Habbal

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Coupling optimisation algorithms to Finite Element (FEM) simulations is a very promisingway to achieve optimal metal forming processes. However, many optimisation algorithms exist and it is notclear which of these algorithms to use. This paper compares an efficient Metamodel Assisted EvolutionaryStrategy (MAES), three variants of a Sequential Approximate Optimisation (SAO) algorithm, and two iterativealgorithms (BFGS and SCPIP). They are compared to each other and to reference situations by application totwo forging examples. It is concluded that bothMAES and SAO outperform the iterative algorithms. Moreover,they yield significant improvements with respect to the reference situations, which makes them both veryinteresting algorithms for optimising metal forming processes

Original language	English
Title of host publication	ESAFORM 2006
Editors	N. Juster, A. Rosochowski
Place of Publication	Glasgow
Publisher	Publishing House AKAPIT
Pages	883-886
Number of pages	4
ISBN (Print)	83-89541-68-8
Publication status	Published - 2006
Event	9th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming 2006 - Glasgow, United Kingdom Duration: 26 Apr 2006 → 28 Apr 2006 Conference number: 9

Conference

Conference	9th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming 2006
Abbreviated title	ESAFORM 2006
Country	United Kingdom
City	Glasgow
Period	26/04/06 → 28/04/06

Keywords

METIS-235928

Access to Document

esaform_conference_2006_bonteAccepted author version, 545 KB

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison between optimisation algorithms for metal forming processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@inproceedings{f8074126ed5847feb76ed00c87f3268f,

title = "A comparison between optimisation algorithms for metal forming processes",

abstract = "Coupling optimisation algorithms to Finite Element (FEM) simulations is a very promisingway to achieve optimal metal forming processes. However, many optimisation algorithms exist and it is notclear which of these algorithms to use. This paper compares an efficient Metamodel Assisted EvolutionaryStrategy (MAES), three variants of a Sequential Approximate Optimisation (SAO) algorithm, and two iterativealgorithms (BFGS and SCPIP). They are compared to each other and to reference situations by application totwo forging examples. It is concluded that bothMAES and SAO outperform the iterative algorithms. Moreover,they yield significant improvements with respect to the reference situations, which makes them both veryinteresting algorithms for optimising metal forming processes",

keywords = "METIS-235928",

author = "M.H.A. Bonte and D.T.D. Do and L. Fourment and {van den Boogaard}, {Antonius H.} and Han Huetink and A. Habbal",

year = "2006",

language = "English",

isbn = "83-89541-68-8",

pages = "883--886",

editor = "N. Juster and A. Rosochowski",

booktitle = "ESAFORM 2006",

publisher = "Publishing House AKAPIT",

address = "Austria",

note = "9th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming 2006, ESAFORM 2006 ; Conference date: 26-04-2006 Through 28-04-2006",

}

A comparison between optimisation algorithms for metal forming processes. / Bonte, M.H.A.; Do, D.T.D.; Fourment, L.; van den Boogaard, Antonius H.; Huetink, Han; Habbal, A.

ESAFORM 2006. ed. / N. Juster; A. Rosochowski. Glasgow : Publishing House AKAPIT, 2006. p. 883-886.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison between optimisation algorithms for metal forming processes

AU - Bonte, M.H.A.

AU - Do, D.T.D.

AU - Fourment, L.

AU - van den Boogaard, Antonius H.

AU - Huetink, Han

AU - Habbal, A.

N1 - Conference code: 9

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Coupling optimisation algorithms to Finite Element (FEM) simulations is a very promisingway to achieve optimal metal forming processes. However, many optimisation algorithms exist and it is notclear which of these algorithms to use. This paper compares an efficient Metamodel Assisted EvolutionaryStrategy (MAES), three variants of a Sequential Approximate Optimisation (SAO) algorithm, and two iterativealgorithms (BFGS and SCPIP). They are compared to each other and to reference situations by application totwo forging examples. It is concluded that bothMAES and SAO outperform the iterative algorithms. Moreover,they yield significant improvements with respect to the reference situations, which makes them both veryinteresting algorithms for optimising metal forming processes

AB - Coupling optimisation algorithms to Finite Element (FEM) simulations is a very promisingway to achieve optimal metal forming processes. However, many optimisation algorithms exist and it is notclear which of these algorithms to use. This paper compares an efficient Metamodel Assisted EvolutionaryStrategy (MAES), three variants of a Sequential Approximate Optimisation (SAO) algorithm, and two iterativealgorithms (BFGS and SCPIP). They are compared to each other and to reference situations by application totwo forging examples. It is concluded that bothMAES and SAO outperform the iterative algorithms. Moreover,they yield significant improvements with respect to the reference situations, which makes them both veryinteresting algorithms for optimising metal forming processes

KW - METIS-235928

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 83-89541-68-8

SP - 883

EP - 886

BT - ESAFORM 2006

A2 - Juster, N.

A2 - Rosochowski, A.

PB - Publishing House AKAPIT

CY - Glasgow

T2 - 9th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming 2006

Y2 - 26 April 2006 through 28 April 2006

ER -