TY - BOOK
T1 - A comparison of operator splitting and approximate matrix factorisation for the shallow water equations in spherical geometry
AU - Lanser, D.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - The shallow water equations (SWEs) in spherical geometry provide abasic prototypefor developing and testing numerical algorithms for solving the horizontaldynamics in global atmospheric circulation models. When solving the SWEs on a global fine uniform lat-lon grid, an explicit timeintegration method suffers from a severe stability restriction on theadmissible step size. In a previous paper, we investigated an A-stable,linearly-implicit, third-order time integration method (Ros3), which wecombinedwith approximate matrix factorization (AMF) to make it cost-effective. Inthis paper, we further explore this method and we compare itto a Strang-type operator splitting method. Our main focus is on the localerror of the methods, their numerical dispersion relation and their accuracyand efficiency when applied to the well-known SWEs test set. Thecomparison shows that Ros3with AMF accurately presents both low and mid frequency waves. Moreover,Ros3 with AMF makes a good candidate for theefficient solution of the SWEs on a global fine lat-longrid. In contrast, Strang splitting is not advocated, in view of itsinaccuracy in the polar area and the resulting inefficiency.
AB - The shallow water equations (SWEs) in spherical geometry provide abasic prototypefor developing and testing numerical algorithms for solving the horizontaldynamics in global atmospheric circulation models. When solving the SWEs on a global fine uniform lat-lon grid, an explicit timeintegration method suffers from a severe stability restriction on theadmissible step size. In a previous paper, we investigated an A-stable,linearly-implicit, third-order time integration method (Ros3), which wecombinedwith approximate matrix factorization (AMF) to make it cost-effective. Inthis paper, we further explore this method and we compare itto a Strang-type operator splitting method. Our main focus is on the localerror of the methods, their numerical dispersion relation and their accuracyand efficiency when applied to the well-known SWEs test set. Thecomparison shows that Ros3with AMF accurately presents both low and mid frequency waves. Moreover,Ros3 with AMF makes a good candidate for theefficient solution of the SWEs on a global fine lat-longrid. In contrast, Strang splitting is not advocated, in view of itsinaccuracy in the polar area and the resulting inefficiency.
KW - METIS-201834
M3 - Report
T3 - Tecnical Report MAS
BT - A comparison of operator splitting and approximate matrix factorisation for the shallow water equations in spherical geometry
PB - Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica
CY - Amsterdam
ER -