A comparison of the person response function and the Iz person-fit statistic

Michael L. Nering, R.R. Meijer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the past several decades, there has been an increasing interest in the development of statistics used to identify examinees who respond to test items in a manner that is divergent from the underlying test model. One statistic that has received a great deal of attention is the lz index (Drasgow, Levine, & Williams, 1985). Trabin & Weiss (1983) developed a slightly different approach for identifying model-divergent response patterns, based on the discrepancy between observed and expected person response functions (PRFs). Here, the PRF method was compared theoretically and empirically to 1z. Although the results suggest that the performance of lz was, in most conditions studied, superior to the PRF method, the PRF method was useful in investigating why a response vector was model divergent. The PRF method can be used along with lz to identify different types of model divergent response patterns.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)53-69
Number of pages16
JournalApplied psychological measurement
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Keywords

  • IR-98623
  • METIS-135406

Cite this

Nering, Michael L. ; Meijer, R.R. / A comparison of the person response function and the Iz person-fit statistic. In: Applied psychological measurement. 1998 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 53-69.
@article{233e369eacd643e8a4896236bc539732,
title = "A comparison of the person response function and the Iz person-fit statistic",
abstract = "In the past several decades, there has been an increasing interest in the development of statistics used to identify examinees who respond to test items in a manner that is divergent from the underlying test model. One statistic that has received a great deal of attention is the lz index (Drasgow, Levine, & Williams, 1985). Trabin & Weiss (1983) developed a slightly different approach for identifying model-divergent response patterns, based on the discrepancy between observed and expected person response functions (PRFs). Here, the PRF method was compared theoretically and empirically to 1z. Although the results suggest that the performance of lz was, in most conditions studied, superior to the PRF method, the PRF method was useful in investigating why a response vector was model divergent. The PRF method can be used along with lz to identify different types of model divergent response patterns.",
keywords = "IR-98623, METIS-135406",
author = "Nering, {Michael L.} and R.R. Meijer",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1177/01466216980221004",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "22",
pages = "53--69",
journal = "Applied psychological measurement",
issn = "0146-6216",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

A comparison of the person response function and the Iz person-fit statistic. / Nering, Michael L.; Meijer, R.R.

In: Applied psychological measurement, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1998, p. 53-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the person response function and the Iz person-fit statistic

AU - Nering, Michael L.

AU - Meijer, R.R.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - In the past several decades, there has been an increasing interest in the development of statistics used to identify examinees who respond to test items in a manner that is divergent from the underlying test model. One statistic that has received a great deal of attention is the lz index (Drasgow, Levine, & Williams, 1985). Trabin & Weiss (1983) developed a slightly different approach for identifying model-divergent response patterns, based on the discrepancy between observed and expected person response functions (PRFs). Here, the PRF method was compared theoretically and empirically to 1z. Although the results suggest that the performance of lz was, in most conditions studied, superior to the PRF method, the PRF method was useful in investigating why a response vector was model divergent. The PRF method can be used along with lz to identify different types of model divergent response patterns.

AB - In the past several decades, there has been an increasing interest in the development of statistics used to identify examinees who respond to test items in a manner that is divergent from the underlying test model. One statistic that has received a great deal of attention is the lz index (Drasgow, Levine, & Williams, 1985). Trabin & Weiss (1983) developed a slightly different approach for identifying model-divergent response patterns, based on the discrepancy between observed and expected person response functions (PRFs). Here, the PRF method was compared theoretically and empirically to 1z. Although the results suggest that the performance of lz was, in most conditions studied, superior to the PRF method, the PRF method was useful in investigating why a response vector was model divergent. The PRF method can be used along with lz to identify different types of model divergent response patterns.

KW - IR-98623

KW - METIS-135406

U2 - 10.1177/01466216980221004

DO - 10.1177/01466216980221004

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 53

EP - 69

JO - Applied psychological measurement

JF - Applied psychological measurement

SN - 0146-6216

IS - 1

ER -