A defense of QUD reasons contextualism

Bryan R. Weaver; Kevin Scharp

doi:10.1080/0020174X.2023.2189918

A defense of QUD reasons contextualism

Bryan R. Weaver
, Kevin Scharp^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

152 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we defend the semantic theory, Question Under Discussion (QUD) Contextualism about Reasons that we develop in our monograph Semantics for Reasons against a series of objections that focus on whether our semantics can deliver predictions for some common examples, how we defend the semantic theory, and how we assess it compared to its competitors.

Original language	English
Journal	Inquiry (Oslo)
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2189918
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print/First online - 3 Mar 2023

Keywords

UT-Hybrid-D
Question under discussion
Reasons
Schroeder
Semantics
Contextualism

Access to Document

10.1080/0020174X.2023.2189918Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

ArticleFinal published version, 1.53 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{4e0346d84518448cbc88ec04d9a134b4,

title = "A defense of QUD reasons contextualism",

abstract = "In this article, we defend the semantic theory, Question Under Discussion (QUD) Contextualism about Reasons that we develop in our monograph Semantics for Reasons against a series of objections that focus on whether our semantics can deliver predictions for some common examples, how we defend the semantic theory, and how we assess it compared to its competitors.",

keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, Question under discussion, Reasons, Schroeder, Semantics, Contextualism",

author = "Weaver, \{Bryan R.\} and Kevin Scharp",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \& Francis Group.",

year = "2023",

month = mar,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1080/0020174X.2023.2189918",

language = "English",

journal = "Inquiry (Oslo)",

issn = "0020-174X",

publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A defense of QUD reasons contextualism

AU - Weaver, Bryan R.

AU - Scharp, Kevin

PY - 2023/3/3

Y1 - 2023/3/3

N2 - In this article, we defend the semantic theory, Question Under Discussion (QUD) Contextualism about Reasons that we develop in our monograph Semantics for Reasons against a series of objections that focus on whether our semantics can deliver predictions for some common examples, how we defend the semantic theory, and how we assess it compared to its competitors.

AB - In this article, we defend the semantic theory, Question Under Discussion (QUD) Contextualism about Reasons that we develop in our monograph Semantics for Reasons against a series of objections that focus on whether our semantics can deliver predictions for some common examples, how we defend the semantic theory, and how we assess it compared to its competitors.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - Question under discussion

KW - Reasons

KW - Schroeder

KW - Semantics

KW - Contextualism

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85152383202

U2 - 10.1080/0020174X.2023.2189918

DO - 10.1080/0020174X.2023.2189918

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85152383202

SN - 0020-174X

JO - Inquiry (Oslo)

JF - Inquiry (Oslo)

ER -

A defense of QUD reasons contextualism

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this