A framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies

Willem Verwey, Charlie Shea, David Wright

Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterOther research output

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Behavioral research produced many task-specific cognitive models that do not say much about the underlying information processing architecture. Such an architecture is badly needed to understand better how cognitive neuroscience can benefit from existing cognitive models. This problem is especially pertinent in the domain of sequential behavior where behavioral research suggests a diversity of cognitive processes, processing modes and representations. Inspired by decades of reaction time (RT) research with the Additive Factors Method, the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm, and the Discrete Sequence Production task, we propose the Cognitive framework for Sequential Motor Behavior (C-SMB). We argue that C-SMB accounts for cognitive models developed for a range of sequential motor tasks (like those proposed by Keele et al., 2003; Rosenbaum et al., 1983, 1986, 1995; Schmidt, 1975; Sternberg et al., 1978, 1988). C-SMB postulates that sequence execution is controlled by a central processor using central-symbolic representations, and a motor processor using sequence-specific motor representations. On the basis of this framework we present a classification of the strategies to produce movement sequences. We complete this presentation by proposing the neural underpinnings of this framework.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 24 Apr 2016
Event26th Neural Control of Movement Annual Meeting 2016 - Hilton Rose Hall Resort, Montego Bay, Jamaica
Duration: 24 Apr 201629 Apr 2016
Conference number: 26

Conference

Conference26th Neural Control of Movement Annual Meeting 2016
CountryJamaica
CityMontego Bay
Period24/04/1629/04/16

Keywords

  • IR-102347
  • METIS-319152

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this