Abstract
When curricula change, teachers have to bring their knowledge and beliefs up to date. Two aspects can be distinguished: what do teachers learn and how is it learned. Two groups of teachers were involved during the preparation of a new chemistry curriculum. One group developed student learning material and subsequently enacted this in class. Another group only class-enacted this. Based on teacher learning, a model to understand teacher growth is presented. As the combination of a development phase with a class enactment phase proved instrumental, an existing model, the interconnected model of teacher professional growth, was extended. The consequence is that for teacher learning for a renewal a (re)development phase followed by a class enactment phase is essential
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 451-470 |
| Journal | Journal of science teacher education |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 May 2015 |
Keywords
- IR-96079
- METIS-310581
- n/a OA procedure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Model for In-service Teacher Learning in the Context of an Innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver