A multi-criteria decision analysis of augmentative treatment of upper limps in persons with tetraplegia

J. Marjan Hummel, Govert J. Snoek, Janine Astrid van Til, Wouter van Rossum, Maarten Joost IJzerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)
38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study supported the evaluation by a rehabilitation team of the performance of two treatment options that improve the arm-hand function in subjects with sixth cervical vertebra (C6) level Motor Group 2 tetraplegia. The analytic hierarchy process, a technique for multicriteria decision analysis, was used by a rehabilitation team and potential recipients to quantitatively compare a new technology, Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), with conventional surgery. Perform-ance was measured by functional improvement, treatment load, risks, user-friendliness, and social outcomes. Functional improvement after FES was considered better than that after conventional surgery. However, the rehabilitation team's overall rating for conventional surgery was slightly higher than that for FES (57% vs 44%). Compared with the rehabilitation team, potential recipients gave greater weight to burden of treatment and less weight to functional improvement. This study shows that evaluation of new technology must be more comprehensive than the evaluation of functional improvement alone, and that patient preferences may differ from those of the rehabilitation team.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)635-644
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of rehabilitation research and development
Volume42
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • rehabilitation team
  • reconstructive surgery
  • shared decision making
  • group decision support
  • hand function therapy
  • Tetraplegia
  • Performance
  • METIS-230909
  • Decision analysis
  • Functional Electrical Stimulation
  • Analytic Hierarchy Process
  • IR-71400

Cite this

@article{2c2d12fd59ec4b99aef8e499a7d815fa,
title = "A multi-criteria decision analysis of augmentative treatment of upper limps in persons with tetraplegia",
abstract = "This study supported the evaluation by a rehabilitation team of the performance of two treatment options that improve the arm-hand function in subjects with sixth cervical vertebra (C6) level Motor Group 2 tetraplegia. The analytic hierarchy process, a technique for multicriteria decision analysis, was used by a rehabilitation team and potential recipients to quantitatively compare a new technology, Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), with conventional surgery. Perform-ance was measured by functional improvement, treatment load, risks, user-friendliness, and social outcomes. Functional improvement after FES was considered better than that after conventional surgery. However, the rehabilitation team's overall rating for conventional surgery was slightly higher than that for FES (57{\%} vs 44{\%}). Compared with the rehabilitation team, potential recipients gave greater weight to burden of treatment and less weight to functional improvement. This study shows that evaluation of new technology must be more comprehensive than the evaluation of functional improvement alone, and that patient preferences may differ from those of the rehabilitation team.",
keywords = "rehabilitation team, reconstructive surgery, shared decision making, group decision support, hand function therapy, Tetraplegia, Performance, METIS-230909, Decision analysis, Functional Electrical Stimulation, Analytic Hierarchy Process, IR-71400",
author = "Hummel, {J. Marjan} and Snoek, {Govert J.} and {van Til}, {Janine Astrid} and {van Rossum}, Wouter and IJzerman, {Maarten Joost}",
year = "2005",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "42",
pages = "635--644",
journal = "Journal of rehabilitation research and development",
issn = "0748-7711",
publisher = "Rehabilitation Research and Development Service",
number = "5",

}

A multi-criteria decision analysis of augmentative treatment of upper limps in persons with tetraplegia. / Hummel, J. Marjan; Snoek, Govert J.; van Til, Janine Astrid; van Rossum, Wouter; IJzerman, Maarten Joost.

In: Journal of rehabilitation research and development, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2005, p. 635-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-criteria decision analysis of augmentative treatment of upper limps in persons with tetraplegia

AU - Hummel, J. Marjan

AU - Snoek, Govert J.

AU - van Til, Janine Astrid

AU - van Rossum, Wouter

AU - IJzerman, Maarten Joost

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This study supported the evaluation by a rehabilitation team of the performance of two treatment options that improve the arm-hand function in subjects with sixth cervical vertebra (C6) level Motor Group 2 tetraplegia. The analytic hierarchy process, a technique for multicriteria decision analysis, was used by a rehabilitation team and potential recipients to quantitatively compare a new technology, Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), with conventional surgery. Perform-ance was measured by functional improvement, treatment load, risks, user-friendliness, and social outcomes. Functional improvement after FES was considered better than that after conventional surgery. However, the rehabilitation team's overall rating for conventional surgery was slightly higher than that for FES (57% vs 44%). Compared with the rehabilitation team, potential recipients gave greater weight to burden of treatment and less weight to functional improvement. This study shows that evaluation of new technology must be more comprehensive than the evaluation of functional improvement alone, and that patient preferences may differ from those of the rehabilitation team.

AB - This study supported the evaluation by a rehabilitation team of the performance of two treatment options that improve the arm-hand function in subjects with sixth cervical vertebra (C6) level Motor Group 2 tetraplegia. The analytic hierarchy process, a technique for multicriteria decision analysis, was used by a rehabilitation team and potential recipients to quantitatively compare a new technology, Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), with conventional surgery. Perform-ance was measured by functional improvement, treatment load, risks, user-friendliness, and social outcomes. Functional improvement after FES was considered better than that after conventional surgery. However, the rehabilitation team's overall rating for conventional surgery was slightly higher than that for FES (57% vs 44%). Compared with the rehabilitation team, potential recipients gave greater weight to burden of treatment and less weight to functional improvement. This study shows that evaluation of new technology must be more comprehensive than the evaluation of functional improvement alone, and that patient preferences may differ from those of the rehabilitation team.

KW - rehabilitation team

KW - reconstructive surgery

KW - shared decision making

KW - group decision support

KW - hand function therapy

KW - Tetraplegia

KW - Performance

KW - METIS-230909

KW - Decision analysis

KW - Functional Electrical Stimulation

KW - Analytic Hierarchy Process

KW - IR-71400

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 635

EP - 644

JO - Journal of rehabilitation research and development

JF - Journal of rehabilitation research and development

SN - 0748-7711

IS - 5

ER -