Research output per year
Research output per year
Willemijn R.G. Verloop*, Claudia J.W. Haarman, Reinout O. van Vliet, John L. de Koning, Johan S. Rietman
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
BACKGROUND: Shoulder complaints from glenohumeral subluxation are a common problem and limit patients during daily activities.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical pros and cons and usability of a newly developed shoulder orthosis (Roessingh Omo Support [ROS]) in patients with chronic shoulder complaints.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: All patients older than 18 years who received the ROS were invited. Medical information was collected from medical records. Two questionnaires were sent to the patient: The "Shoulder Rating Questionnaire" (SRQ, max 100 points) for evaluation before and during use and a custom orthosis usability questionnaire.
RESULTS: In total, 28 patients (34 orthoses) participated in the study. Neuralgic amyotrophy was the most common diagnosis (64.3%). The SRQ showed a significant positive change of 8.9 points (from 35.0 [SD 12.6] to 43.9 [SD 14.3]). The most described goal was pain reduction (76.5%). 47.1% of the patients achieved their goal(s), and 71.4% were still using the orthosis. The mean satisfaction rate was 7.1 (SD 1.4).
CONCLUSION: The use of the ROS shows a significant functional improvement (SRQ), a decrease of pain, and a high degree of satisfaction, although the individual experiences of the patients are highly variable. Some modifications to the design to improve comfort may be needed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 322-327 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Prosthetics and orthotics international |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2021 |
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review