A note on measurement scales and statistical testing

R.R. Meijer, Sebe J. Oosterloo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In elementary books on applied statistics (e.g., Siegel, 1988; Agresti, 1990) and books on research methodology in psychology and personality assessment (e.g., Aiken, 1999), it is often suggested that the choice of a statistical test and the choice of statistical operations should be determined by the level of measurement of the data. Although schemes based on this idea will in many situations lead to reasonable choices, a more liberal attitude towards the choice of tests is advocated. Depending on the deviations from the null hypotheses that the researcher expects, it can be quite reasonable, for example, to use Wilcoxon's rank sum test when comparing two groups on the basis of nominal data. Examples are given to illustrate our propositions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-204
JournalMeasurement : interdisciplinary research and perspectives (USA)
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Statistical tests
Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Statistics
Testing
Nominal or categorical data
statistical test
Statistical test
Null hypothesis
Proposition
personality
Deviation
psychology
statistics
Methodology
methodology
Group
Personality
Psychology

Keywords

  • METIS-253495
  • IR-94314

Cite this

Meijer, R.R. ; Oosterloo, Sebe J. / A note on measurement scales and statistical testing. In: Measurement : interdisciplinary research and perspectives (USA). 2008 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 198-204.
@article{99b18dfd42104a24bcab5606d8167bd8,
title = "A note on measurement scales and statistical testing",
abstract = "In elementary books on applied statistics (e.g., Siegel, 1988; Agresti, 1990) and books on research methodology in psychology and personality assessment (e.g., Aiken, 1999), it is often suggested that the choice of a statistical test and the choice of statistical operations should be determined by the level of measurement of the data. Although schemes based on this idea will in many situations lead to reasonable choices, a more liberal attitude towards the choice of tests is advocated. Depending on the deviations from the null hypotheses that the researcher expects, it can be quite reasonable, for example, to use Wilcoxon's rank sum test when comparing two groups on the basis of nominal data. Examples are given to illustrate our propositions.",
keywords = "METIS-253495, IR-94314",
author = "R.R. Meijer and Oosterloo, {Sebe J.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/15366360802324446",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "198--204",
journal = "Measurement : interdisciplinary research and perspectives (USA)",
issn = "1536-6367",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "3",

}

A note on measurement scales and statistical testing. / Meijer, R.R.; Oosterloo, Sebe J.

In: Measurement : interdisciplinary research and perspectives (USA), Vol. 6, No. 3, 2008, p. 198-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on measurement scales and statistical testing

AU - Meijer, R.R.

AU - Oosterloo, Sebe J.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In elementary books on applied statistics (e.g., Siegel, 1988; Agresti, 1990) and books on research methodology in psychology and personality assessment (e.g., Aiken, 1999), it is often suggested that the choice of a statistical test and the choice of statistical operations should be determined by the level of measurement of the data. Although schemes based on this idea will in many situations lead to reasonable choices, a more liberal attitude towards the choice of tests is advocated. Depending on the deviations from the null hypotheses that the researcher expects, it can be quite reasonable, for example, to use Wilcoxon's rank sum test when comparing two groups on the basis of nominal data. Examples are given to illustrate our propositions.

AB - In elementary books on applied statistics (e.g., Siegel, 1988; Agresti, 1990) and books on research methodology in psychology and personality assessment (e.g., Aiken, 1999), it is often suggested that the choice of a statistical test and the choice of statistical operations should be determined by the level of measurement of the data. Although schemes based on this idea will in many situations lead to reasonable choices, a more liberal attitude towards the choice of tests is advocated. Depending on the deviations from the null hypotheses that the researcher expects, it can be quite reasonable, for example, to use Wilcoxon's rank sum test when comparing two groups on the basis of nominal data. Examples are given to illustrate our propositions.

KW - METIS-253495

KW - IR-94314

U2 - 10.1080/15366360802324446

DO - 10.1080/15366360802324446

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 198

EP - 204

JO - Measurement : interdisciplinary research and perspectives (USA)

JF - Measurement : interdisciplinary research and perspectives (USA)

SN - 1536-6367

IS - 3

ER -