A part-declared blind testing program in firearms examination

W. Kerkhoff (Corresponding Author), R. D. Stoel, E. J.A.T. Mattijssen, C. E.H. Berger, F. W. Didden, J. H. Kerstholt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In 2015 and 2016 the Central Unit of the Dutch National Police created and submitted 21 cartridge case comparison tests as real cases to the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI), under supervision of the University of Twente (UT). A total of 53 conclusions were drawn in these 21 tests. For 31 conclusions the underlying ground truth was “positive”, in the sense that it addressed a cluster of cartridge cases that was fired from the same firearm. For 22 conclusions the ground truth was “negative”, in the sense that the cartridge cases were fired from different firearms. In none of the conclusions, resulting from examinations under casework conditions, misleading evidence was reported. All conclusions supported the hypothesis reflecting the ground truth. This article discusses the design and results of the tests in more detail.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)258-263
Number of pages6
JournalScience & justice
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Firearms
Police
Netherlands

Keywords

  • Blind testing
  • Bullet and cartridge case comparison
  • Fake cases
  • Part declared testing
  • Proficiency test

Cite this

Kerkhoff, W., Stoel, R. D., Mattijssen, E. J. A. T., Berger, C. E. H., Didden, F. W., & Kerstholt, J. H. (2018). A part-declared blind testing program in firearms examination. Science & justice, 58(4), 258-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2018.03.006
Kerkhoff, W. ; Stoel, R. D. ; Mattijssen, E. J.A.T. ; Berger, C. E.H. ; Didden, F. W. ; Kerstholt, J. H. / A part-declared blind testing program in firearms examination. In: Science & justice. 2018 ; Vol. 58, No. 4. pp. 258-263.
@article{10b22e2a8a4e4371b0c52bb7a405ad99,
title = "A part-declared blind testing program in firearms examination",
abstract = "In 2015 and 2016 the Central Unit of the Dutch National Police created and submitted 21 cartridge case comparison tests as real cases to the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI), under supervision of the University of Twente (UT). A total of 53 conclusions were drawn in these 21 tests. For 31 conclusions the underlying ground truth was “positive”, in the sense that it addressed a cluster of cartridge cases that was fired from the same firearm. For 22 conclusions the ground truth was “negative”, in the sense that the cartridge cases were fired from different firearms. In none of the conclusions, resulting from examinations under casework conditions, misleading evidence was reported. All conclusions supported the hypothesis reflecting the ground truth. This article discusses the design and results of the tests in more detail.",
keywords = "Blind testing, Bullet and cartridge case comparison, Fake cases, Part declared testing, Proficiency test",
author = "W. Kerkhoff and Stoel, {R. D.} and Mattijssen, {E. J.A.T.} and Berger, {C. E.H.} and Didden, {F. W.} and Kerstholt, {J. H.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.scijus.2018.03.006",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "258--263",
journal = "Science & justice",
issn = "1355-0306",
publisher = "Forensic Science Society",
number = "4",

}

Kerkhoff, W, Stoel, RD, Mattijssen, EJAT, Berger, CEH, Didden, FW & Kerstholt, JH 2018, 'A part-declared blind testing program in firearms examination' Science & justice, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 258-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2018.03.006

A part-declared blind testing program in firearms examination. / Kerkhoff, W. (Corresponding Author); Stoel, R. D.; Mattijssen, E. J.A.T.; Berger, C. E.H.; Didden, F. W.; Kerstholt, J. H.

In: Science & justice, Vol. 58, No. 4, 07.2018, p. 258-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A part-declared blind testing program in firearms examination

AU - Kerkhoff, W.

AU - Stoel, R. D.

AU - Mattijssen, E. J.A.T.

AU - Berger, C. E.H.

AU - Didden, F. W.

AU - Kerstholt, J. H.

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - In 2015 and 2016 the Central Unit of the Dutch National Police created and submitted 21 cartridge case comparison tests as real cases to the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI), under supervision of the University of Twente (UT). A total of 53 conclusions were drawn in these 21 tests. For 31 conclusions the underlying ground truth was “positive”, in the sense that it addressed a cluster of cartridge cases that was fired from the same firearm. For 22 conclusions the ground truth was “negative”, in the sense that the cartridge cases were fired from different firearms. In none of the conclusions, resulting from examinations under casework conditions, misleading evidence was reported. All conclusions supported the hypothesis reflecting the ground truth. This article discusses the design and results of the tests in more detail.

AB - In 2015 and 2016 the Central Unit of the Dutch National Police created and submitted 21 cartridge case comparison tests as real cases to the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI), under supervision of the University of Twente (UT). A total of 53 conclusions were drawn in these 21 tests. For 31 conclusions the underlying ground truth was “positive”, in the sense that it addressed a cluster of cartridge cases that was fired from the same firearm. For 22 conclusions the ground truth was “negative”, in the sense that the cartridge cases were fired from different firearms. In none of the conclusions, resulting from examinations under casework conditions, misleading evidence was reported. All conclusions supported the hypothesis reflecting the ground truth. This article discusses the design and results of the tests in more detail.

KW - Blind testing

KW - Bullet and cartridge case comparison

KW - Fake cases

KW - Part declared testing

KW - Proficiency test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044865970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.03.006

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 258

EP - 263

JO - Science & justice

JF - Science & justice

SN - 1355-0306

IS - 4

ER -