A research on environmental rating systems considering building energy performances in different climatic regions of Turkey

Ilknur Akiner, Muhammed E. Akıner, Wilco Tijhuis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Turkey’s diverse regions lead to complex issues in sustainability. We studied to cities in different areas of the country to examine the effects of local climate on energy use in energy-efficient buildings. Erzurum is the coldest city; Antalya lies in the Mediterranean region and has the highest solar global horizontal radiation in Turkey. We used Heating Degree Days (HDD) and Cooling Degree Days (CDD) values for both cities to estimate the energy demand for heating and cooling the buildings. In Erzurum, CO2 emissions are high, because fuel consumption to heat the same building is more than 4 times of that of Antalya in winter. CO2 emission is significant as the key greenhouse gas. In Antalya, the electricity costs for cooling the same building are more than 42 times that of Erzurum; CO2 emissions are also higher during summer. A building certified by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) uses about 35% less energy for heating and cooling in both cities. The economic and environmental contributions of a LEED-certified building in Erzurum is higher during cold weather, while in Antalya, a LEED-certified building conserves comparatively more energy and retains more CO2 during hot weather. The results show that the LEED Certification System can be a more international system if geographical and climatic differences are also taken into consideration.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1230-1237
    Number of pages8
    JournalKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
    Volume19
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2015

    Fingerprint

    Cooling
    Heating
    Greenhouse gases
    Fuel consumption
    Sustainable development
    Electricity
    Radiation
    Economics
    Environmental design
    Costs
    Hot Temperature

    Keywords

    • carbon dioxide emission
    • cooling degree days
    • energy
    • heating degree days
    • leadership in energy and environmental design
    • sustainability
    • Turkey

    Cite this

    @article{f4734380d7184f6086e454af0e4df4b4,
    title = "A research on environmental rating systems considering building energy performances in different climatic regions of Turkey",
    abstract = "Turkey’s diverse regions lead to complex issues in sustainability. We studied to cities in different areas of the country to examine the effects of local climate on energy use in energy-efficient buildings. Erzurum is the coldest city; Antalya lies in the Mediterranean region and has the highest solar global horizontal radiation in Turkey. We used Heating Degree Days (HDD) and Cooling Degree Days (CDD) values for both cities to estimate the energy demand for heating and cooling the buildings. In Erzurum, CO2 emissions are high, because fuel consumption to heat the same building is more than 4 times of that of Antalya in winter. CO2 emission is significant as the key greenhouse gas. In Antalya, the electricity costs for cooling the same building are more than 42 times that of Erzurum; CO2 emissions are also higher during summer. A building certified by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) uses about 35{\%} less energy for heating and cooling in both cities. The economic and environmental contributions of a LEED-certified building in Erzurum is higher during cold weather, while in Antalya, a LEED-certified building conserves comparatively more energy and retains more CO2 during hot weather. The results show that the LEED Certification System can be a more international system if geographical and climatic differences are also taken into consideration.",
    keywords = "carbon dioxide emission, cooling degree days, energy, heating degree days, leadership in energy and environmental design, sustainability, Turkey",
    author = "Ilknur Akiner and Akıner, {Muhammed E.} and Wilco Tijhuis",
    year = "2015",
    month = "7",
    day = "29",
    doi = "10.1007/s12205-013-1463-x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "1230--1237",
    journal = "KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering",
    issn = "1226-7988",
    publisher = "Korean Society of Civil Engineers",
    number = "5",

    }

    A research on environmental rating systems considering building energy performances in different climatic regions of Turkey. / Akiner, Ilknur; Akıner, Muhammed E.; Tijhuis, Wilco.

    In: KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 5, 29.07.2015, p. 1230-1237.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A research on environmental rating systems considering building energy performances in different climatic regions of Turkey

    AU - Akiner, Ilknur

    AU - Akıner, Muhammed E.

    AU - Tijhuis, Wilco

    PY - 2015/7/29

    Y1 - 2015/7/29

    N2 - Turkey’s diverse regions lead to complex issues in sustainability. We studied to cities in different areas of the country to examine the effects of local climate on energy use in energy-efficient buildings. Erzurum is the coldest city; Antalya lies in the Mediterranean region and has the highest solar global horizontal radiation in Turkey. We used Heating Degree Days (HDD) and Cooling Degree Days (CDD) values for both cities to estimate the energy demand for heating and cooling the buildings. In Erzurum, CO2 emissions are high, because fuel consumption to heat the same building is more than 4 times of that of Antalya in winter. CO2 emission is significant as the key greenhouse gas. In Antalya, the electricity costs for cooling the same building are more than 42 times that of Erzurum; CO2 emissions are also higher during summer. A building certified by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) uses about 35% less energy for heating and cooling in both cities. The economic and environmental contributions of a LEED-certified building in Erzurum is higher during cold weather, while in Antalya, a LEED-certified building conserves comparatively more energy and retains more CO2 during hot weather. The results show that the LEED Certification System can be a more international system if geographical and climatic differences are also taken into consideration.

    AB - Turkey’s diverse regions lead to complex issues in sustainability. We studied to cities in different areas of the country to examine the effects of local climate on energy use in energy-efficient buildings. Erzurum is the coldest city; Antalya lies in the Mediterranean region and has the highest solar global horizontal radiation in Turkey. We used Heating Degree Days (HDD) and Cooling Degree Days (CDD) values for both cities to estimate the energy demand for heating and cooling the buildings. In Erzurum, CO2 emissions are high, because fuel consumption to heat the same building is more than 4 times of that of Antalya in winter. CO2 emission is significant as the key greenhouse gas. In Antalya, the electricity costs for cooling the same building are more than 42 times that of Erzurum; CO2 emissions are also higher during summer. A building certified by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) uses about 35% less energy for heating and cooling in both cities. The economic and environmental contributions of a LEED-certified building in Erzurum is higher during cold weather, while in Antalya, a LEED-certified building conserves comparatively more energy and retains more CO2 during hot weather. The results show that the LEED Certification System can be a more international system if geographical and climatic differences are also taken into consideration.

    KW - carbon dioxide emission

    KW - cooling degree days

    KW - energy

    KW - heating degree days

    KW - leadership in energy and environmental design

    KW - sustainability

    KW - Turkey

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912553253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s12205-013-1463-x

    DO - 10.1007/s12205-013-1463-x

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84912553253

    VL - 19

    SP - 1230

    EP - 1237

    JO - KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

    JF - KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

    SN - 1226-7988

    IS - 5

    ER -