A systematic decision-making process flow for circular dismantling of trains: a case study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper investigates the decision-making process for dismantling assets at the end of their lifecycle, focusing on maximizing circularity through reuse, resale, and recycling. Through a case study on train dismantling, this research outlines a structured process to ensure efficient, sustainable disposal of materials, guided by established frameworks and strategies prioritizing circular economy principles. The case study identifies 18 key steps involved in dismantling a train, involving eleven stakeholders, each assigned distinct roles such as responsible, accountable, supporting, advising, and informed. These roles help ensure a collaborative approach that aligns with sustainability goals. The analysis also includes insights into the critical decision-making factors that guide the prioritization of actions, such as selling surplus assets, reusing parts, and recycling remaining materials. Furthermore, the paper explores the broader application of this decision-making flow to other stakeholders and companies involved in dismantling, offering comprehensive insights for sustainable asset disposal. This study highlights how organizations can successfully implement dismantling strategies that advance circular economy objectives by outlining clear roles and responsibilities.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages6
JournalProcedia CIRP
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2025
Event32nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, LCE 2025 - Manchester, United Kingdom
Duration: 7 Apr 20259 Apr 2025
Conference number: 32

Keywords

  • circular economy
  • dismantling
  • circular dismantling
  • sustainability
  • recycling
  • reuse
  • railway transport
  • decision-making
  • asset disposal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic decision-making process flow for circular dismantling of trains: a case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this