In this paper we contrast two approaches of conceptualising and operationalising partisanship. The first defines partisanship as a social identity, following the original conceptualisation by the Michigan scholars. The second defines partisanship as a configuration of attitudes or party evaluations. We discuss the differences between both approaches and present empirical analyses using cross-national survey data to show that both approaches lead to different conclusions regarding (1) the number of partisans, (2) the stability of partisanship, and (3) the relationship between partisanship and vote choice. Building on these findings, we present a conceptualisation that comprises both elements; that is, partisan identity and party evaluations. We put forward a view on how these elements relate to each other and which one is most relevant in which context.
Conference | 31st ISPP Annual Scientific Meeting 2008 |
---|
Country/Territory | France |
---|
City | Paris |
---|
Period | 9/07/08 → 12/07/08 |
---|