A Theory of Dual Partisanship

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    13 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this paper we contrast two approaches of conceptualising and operationalising partisanship. The first defines partisanship as a social identity, following the original conceptualisation by the Michigan scholars. The second defines partisanship as a configuration of attitudes or party evaluations. We discuss the differences between both approaches and present empirical analyses using cross-national survey data to show that both approaches lead to different conclusions regarding (1) the number of partisans, (2) the stability of partisanship, and (3) the relationship between partisanship and vote choice. Building on these findings, we present a conceptualisation that comprises both elements; that is, partisan identity and party evaluations. We put forward a view on how these elements relate to each other and which one is most relevant in which context.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    Event31st ISPP Annual Scientific Meeting 2008 - Paris, France
    Duration: 9 Jul 200812 Jul 2008
    Conference number: 31

    Conference

    Conference31st ISPP Annual Scientific Meeting 2008
    Country/TerritoryFrance
    CityParis
    Period9/07/0812/07/08

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Theory of Dual Partisanship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this