Academic misconduct and research productivity of business scholars: Researchers’ moral posture in the context of autonomy and competition

Isabella Hatak, Rainer Harms, Johannes Gartner

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study investigates whether business scholars’ moral posture is related to their productivity in terms of peer-reviewed publications and research funds. We distinguish between deontological and consequentialist moral postures and take account of the moderating role of researchers’ perceived autonomy and the competition between them. The empirical results show that strong moral postures do not diminish research productivity. Both perceived autonomy and competition foster researchers’ productivity. Interestingly, a deontological moral posture fosters researchers’ productivity in contexts of low competition, but diminishes it in highly competitive settings. The findings suggest that measures for ethical governance in research need to consider not only the moral posture that underlies researchers’ ethical decision making, but also the institutional environment in which researchers are embedded.
    Original languageEnglish
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017
    Event77th Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2017: At The Interface - Atlanta, United States
    Duration: 4 Aug 20178 Aug 2017
    Conference number: 77
    http://aom.org/annualmeeting/

    Conference

    Conference77th Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2017
    CountryUnited States
    CityAtlanta
    Period4/08/178/08/17
    Internet address

    Fingerprint

    autonomy
    productivity
    governance
    decision making

    Cite this

    Hatak, Isabella ; Harms, Rainer ; Gartner, Johannes. / Academic misconduct and research productivity of business scholars : Researchers’ moral posture in the context of autonomy and competition. Paper presented at 77th Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2017, Atlanta, United States.
    @conference{325ef9ea9d8740d18f082163a160a297,
    title = "Academic misconduct and research productivity of business scholars: Researchers’ moral posture in the context of autonomy and competition",
    abstract = "This study investigates whether business scholars’ moral posture is related to their productivity in terms of peer-reviewed publications and research funds. We distinguish between deontological and consequentialist moral postures and take account of the moderating role of researchers’ perceived autonomy and the competition between them. The empirical results show that strong moral postures do not diminish research productivity. Both perceived autonomy and competition foster researchers’ productivity. Interestingly, a deontological moral posture fosters researchers’ productivity in contexts of low competition, but diminishes it in highly competitive settings. The findings suggest that measures for ethical governance in research need to consider not only the moral posture that underlies researchers’ ethical decision making, but also the institutional environment in which researchers are embedded.",
    author = "Isabella Hatak and Rainer Harms and Johannes Gartner",
    year = "2017",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2017.15748abstract",
    language = "English",
    note = "77th Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2017 : At The Interface ; Conference date: 04-08-2017 Through 08-08-2017",
    url = "http://aom.org/annualmeeting/",

    }

    Academic misconduct and research productivity of business scholars : Researchers’ moral posture in the context of autonomy and competition. / Hatak, Isabella ; Harms, Rainer ; Gartner, Johannes.

    2017. Paper presented at 77th Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2017, Atlanta, United States.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademicpeer-review

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Academic misconduct and research productivity of business scholars

    T2 - Researchers’ moral posture in the context of autonomy and competition

    AU - Hatak, Isabella

    AU - Harms, Rainer

    AU - Gartner, Johannes

    PY - 2017/8

    Y1 - 2017/8

    N2 - This study investigates whether business scholars’ moral posture is related to their productivity in terms of peer-reviewed publications and research funds. We distinguish between deontological and consequentialist moral postures and take account of the moderating role of researchers’ perceived autonomy and the competition between them. The empirical results show that strong moral postures do not diminish research productivity. Both perceived autonomy and competition foster researchers’ productivity. Interestingly, a deontological moral posture fosters researchers’ productivity in contexts of low competition, but diminishes it in highly competitive settings. The findings suggest that measures for ethical governance in research need to consider not only the moral posture that underlies researchers’ ethical decision making, but also the institutional environment in which researchers are embedded.

    AB - This study investigates whether business scholars’ moral posture is related to their productivity in terms of peer-reviewed publications and research funds. We distinguish between deontological and consequentialist moral postures and take account of the moderating role of researchers’ perceived autonomy and the competition between them. The empirical results show that strong moral postures do not diminish research productivity. Both perceived autonomy and competition foster researchers’ productivity. Interestingly, a deontological moral posture fosters researchers’ productivity in contexts of low competition, but diminishes it in highly competitive settings. The findings suggest that measures for ethical governance in research need to consider not only the moral posture that underlies researchers’ ethical decision making, but also the institutional environment in which researchers are embedded.

    U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.15748abstract

    DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.15748abstract

    M3 - Paper

    ER -