Acceptatie van pijn: problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

H.R. Trompetter; Hester R. Trompetter; Peter M. ten Klooster; Albere Koke; Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

Acceptatie van pijn: problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

H.R. Trompetter, Hester R. Trompetter, Peter M. ten Klooster, Albere Koke, Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Acceptance of pain appears as an important factor in pain research and in practice. Different measurement instruments were developed, among which the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ;McCracken, Vowles & Eccleston, 2004). In this study possible psychometric problems with the Dutch version of the CPAQ are investigated. Different models of the CPAQ, among which the general two-factor model (subscales Activity Engagement and PainWillingness), were tested in confirmatory factor analysis (N = 584). None of the models met the established fit criteria for adequate fit. It is concluded that the factor structure of the Dutch version of the CPAQ can not be confirmed; the scale as such should be rejected as a useful measurement instrument. Alternative questionnaires to measure acceptance of pain (ICQ, PaSol, PIPS) are suggested

Original language	Dutch
Pages (from-to)	292-300
Journal	Psychologie & gezondheid
Volume	39
Issue number	5
Publication status	Published - 2011

Keywords

METIS-281397
IR-82750

Access to Document

http://vb23.bsl.nl/frontend/redir.asp?page=1873-1791/09014f3c802cce22.html

Cite this

@article{d2be63f73909496f9952ad0acb325bc9,

title = "Acceptatie van pijn: problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)",

abstract = "Acceptance of pain appears as an important factor in pain research and in practice. Different measurement instruments were developed, among which the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ;McCracken, Vowles & Eccleston, 2004). In this study possible psychometric problems with the Dutch version of the CPAQ are investigated. Different models of the CPAQ, among which the general two-factor model (subscales Activity Engagement and PainWillingness), were tested in confirmatory factor analysis (N = 584). None of the models met the established fit criteria for adequate fit. It is concluded that the factor structure of the Dutch version of the CPAQ can not be confirmed; the scale as such should be rejected as a useful measurement instrument. Alternative questionnaires to measure acceptance of pain (ICQ, PaSol, PIPS) are suggested",

keywords = "METIS-281397, IR-82750",

author = "H.R. Trompetter and Trompetter, {Hester R.} and {ten Klooster}, {Peter M.} and Albere Koke and Schreurs, {Karlein Maria Gertrudis}",

year = "2011",

language = "Dutch",

volume = "39",

pages = "292--300",

journal = "Psychologie & gezondheid",

issn = "1873-1791",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "5",

}

Acceptatie van pijn: problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). / Trompetter, H.R.; Trompetter, Hester R.; ten Klooster, Peter M.; Koke, Albere; Schreurs, Karlein Maria Gertrudis.

In: Psychologie & gezondheid, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2011, p. 292-300.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptatie van pijn: problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

AU - Trompetter, H.R.

AU - Trompetter, Hester R.

AU - ten Klooster, Peter M.

AU - Koke, Albere

AU - Schreurs, Karlein Maria Gertrudis

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Acceptance of pain appears as an important factor in pain research and in practice. Different measurement instruments were developed, among which the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ;McCracken, Vowles & Eccleston, 2004). In this study possible psychometric problems with the Dutch version of the CPAQ are investigated. Different models of the CPAQ, among which the general two-factor model (subscales Activity Engagement and PainWillingness), were tested in confirmatory factor analysis (N = 584). None of the models met the established fit criteria for adequate fit. It is concluded that the factor structure of the Dutch version of the CPAQ can not be confirmed; the scale as such should be rejected as a useful measurement instrument. Alternative questionnaires to measure acceptance of pain (ICQ, PaSol, PIPS) are suggested

AB - Acceptance of pain appears as an important factor in pain research and in practice. Different measurement instruments were developed, among which the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ;McCracken, Vowles & Eccleston, 2004). In this study possible psychometric problems with the Dutch version of the CPAQ are investigated. Different models of the CPAQ, among which the general two-factor model (subscales Activity Engagement and PainWillingness), were tested in confirmatory factor analysis (N = 584). None of the models met the established fit criteria for adequate fit. It is concluded that the factor structure of the Dutch version of the CPAQ can not be confirmed; the scale as such should be rejected as a useful measurement instrument. Alternative questionnaires to measure acceptance of pain (ICQ, PaSol, PIPS) are suggested

KW - METIS-281397

KW - IR-82750

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 292

EP - 300

JO - Psychologie & gezondheid

JF - Psychologie & gezondheid

SN - 1873-1791

IS - 5

ER -