Acceptatie van pijn: problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

Hester R. Trompetter; Peter M. ten Klooster; Albere Koke; Karlein M.G. Schreurs

doi:10.1007/s12483-011-0056-y

Acceptatie van pijn: problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

Hester R. Trompetter, Peter M. ten Klooster, Albere Koke, Karlein M.G. Schreurs

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Acceptance of pain appears as an important factor in pain research and in practice. Different measurement instruments were developed, among which the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ;McCracken, Vowles & Eccleston, 2004). In this study possible psychometric problems with the Dutch version of the CPAQ are investigated. Different models of the CPAQ, among which the general two-factor model (subscales Activity Engagement and PainWillingness), were tested in confirmatory factor analysis (N = 584). None of the models met the established fit criteria for adequate fit. It is concluded that the factor structure of the Dutch version of the CPAQ can not be confirmed; the scale as such should be rejected as a useful measurement instrument. Alternative questionnaires to measure acceptance of pain (ICQ, PaSol, PIPS) are suggested

Original language	Dutch
Pages (from-to)	292-300
Journal	Psychologie & gezondheid
Volume	39
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s12483-011-0056-y
Publication status	Published - 2011

Access to Document

10.1007/s12483-011-0056-y

Cite this

@article{d2be63f73909496f9952ad0acb325bc9,

title = "Acceptatie van pijn: problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)",

abstract = "Acceptance of pain appears as an important factor in pain research and in practice. Different measurement instruments were developed, among which the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ;McCracken, Vowles & Eccleston, 2004). In this study possible psychometric problems with the Dutch version of the CPAQ are investigated. Different models of the CPAQ, among which the general two-factor model (subscales Activity Engagement and PainWillingness), were tested in confirmatory factor analysis (N = 584). None of the models met the established fit criteria for adequate fit. It is concluded that the factor structure of the Dutch version of the CPAQ can not be confirmed; the scale as such should be rejected as a useful measurement instrument. Alternative questionnaires to measure acceptance of pain (ICQ, PaSol, PIPS) are suggested",

author = "Trompetter, {Hester R.} and {ten Klooster}, {Peter M.} and Albere Koke and Schreurs, {Karlein M.G.}",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1007/s12483-011-0056-y",

language = "Dutch",

volume = "39",

pages = "292--300",

journal = "Psychologie & gezondheid",

issn = "1873-1791",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "5",

}

Acceptatie van pijn : problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). / Trompetter, Hester R.; ten Klooster, Peter M.; Koke, Albere; Schreurs, Karlein M.G.

In: Psychologie & gezondheid, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2011, p. 292-300.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptatie van pijn

T2 - problemen met de factoriele validiteit van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

AU - Trompetter, Hester R.

AU - ten Klooster, Peter M.

AU - Koke, Albere

AU - Schreurs, Karlein M.G.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Acceptance of pain appears as an important factor in pain research and in practice. Different measurement instruments were developed, among which the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ;McCracken, Vowles & Eccleston, 2004). In this study possible psychometric problems with the Dutch version of the CPAQ are investigated. Different models of the CPAQ, among which the general two-factor model (subscales Activity Engagement and PainWillingness), were tested in confirmatory factor analysis (N = 584). None of the models met the established fit criteria for adequate fit. It is concluded that the factor structure of the Dutch version of the CPAQ can not be confirmed; the scale as such should be rejected as a useful measurement instrument. Alternative questionnaires to measure acceptance of pain (ICQ, PaSol, PIPS) are suggested

AB - Acceptance of pain appears as an important factor in pain research and in practice. Different measurement instruments were developed, among which the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ;McCracken, Vowles & Eccleston, 2004). In this study possible psychometric problems with the Dutch version of the CPAQ are investigated. Different models of the CPAQ, among which the general two-factor model (subscales Activity Engagement and PainWillingness), were tested in confirmatory factor analysis (N = 584). None of the models met the established fit criteria for adequate fit. It is concluded that the factor structure of the Dutch version of the CPAQ can not be confirmed; the scale as such should be rejected as a useful measurement instrument. Alternative questionnaires to measure acceptance of pain (ICQ, PaSol, PIPS) are suggested

U2 - 10.1007/s12483-011-0056-y

DO - 10.1007/s12483-011-0056-y

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 292

EP - 300

JO - Psychologie & gezondheid

JF - Psychologie & gezondheid

SN - 1873-1791

IS - 5

ER -