Accessibility benefi ts of integrated land use and public transport policy plans in the netherlands

Karst T. Geurs*, Michiel de Bok, Barry Zondag

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Major investments in public transport in the Netherlands are often considered inefficient from a welfare economic perspective. Bakker and Zwaneveld (2010) show that of about 150 social cost–benefit analyses (CBAs) of public transport projects in the Netherlands conducted in the past decades, only one-third of the projects had a positive benefit–cost ratio. These public transport projects were typically not part of an integrated planning approach, and the CBAs examined the costs and benefits of the transport projects only. In particular, the role of spatial planning or spatial developments in these CBAs was ignored or not made explicit (that is, land use is assumed to be fixed or does not differ between project alternatives). In recent years, however, integrated spatial and transport planning has received more attention in Dutch national policy-making. In 2007, a national policy document, Randstad Urgent, was published, aiming to improve cooperation between national and regional governments and create a joint policy decision-making process for different spatial projects and transport infrastructure projects that are to be realized within the same region (Ministry of Transport Public Works and Water Management, 2007). The policy document focused on 40 projects within the Randstad Area, the most urbanized region in the western part of the Netherlands. The aim of this new approach is to speed up the decision-making process and increase the social benefit–cost ratio of the projects. In this chapter, we examine the RAAM project (‘Rijksbesluiten Amsterdam – Almere – Markermeer’), the largest integrated policy project included in Randstad Urgent. The project involves adding 60 000 dwellings and 100 000 jobs and major transport investments in the corridor between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Amsterdam and Almere, located 30 kilometres east of Amsterdam (see Figure 8.1). Almere would nearly double in size from its current 190 000 to 350 000 inhabitants by 2030. Local governments developed three spatial policy alternatives for the development of Almere with tailored public transport investment programmes. Almere is a new town built on reclaimed land (a polder) with two bridges linking two motorways (A6 and A27) and a railway (parallel to the A6) linking to the mainland. These road connections are already severely congested and rail capacity is insufficient to increase train frequencies substantially. Doubling the population of Almere is not considered feasible without major infrastructure expansion. Transport investments are thus seen of crucial importance to the future population growth of Almere.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAccessibility Analysis and Transport Planning
    Subtitle of host publicationChallenges for Europe and North America
    EditorsKarst T. Geurs, Kevin J. Krizek, Aura Reggiani
    PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
    Chapter8
    Pages135-153
    Number of pages19
    ISBN (Electronic)9781781000113
    ISBN (Print)9781781000106
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

    Publication series

    NameNECTAR Series on Transportation and Communications Networks Research
    PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing

    Fingerprint

    public transport
    Netherlands
    land use
    decision-making process
    Accessibility
    Transport policy
    Public transport
    The Netherlands
    Land use
    Integrated
    infrastructure
    integrated planning
    welfare economics
    spatial planning
    Cost-benefit
    airport
    population growth
    water management
    ministry
    inhabitant

    Cite this

    Geurs, K. T., de Bok, M., & Zondag, B. (2012). Accessibility benefi ts of integrated land use and public transport policy plans in the netherlands. In K. T. Geurs, K. J. Krizek, & A. Reggiani (Eds.), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning: Challenges for Europe and North America (pp. 135-153). (NECTAR Series on Transportation and Communications Networks Research). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781000113.00016
    Geurs, Karst T. ; de Bok, Michiel ; Zondag, Barry. / Accessibility benefi ts of integrated land use and public transport policy plans in the netherlands. Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning: Challenges for Europe and North America. editor / Karst T. Geurs ; Kevin J. Krizek ; Aura Reggiani. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2012. pp. 135-153 (NECTAR Series on Transportation and Communications Networks Research).
    @inbook{c4a40106d1fe463eb12316b31029a0fa,
    title = "Accessibility benefi ts of integrated land use and public transport policy plans in the netherlands",
    abstract = "Major investments in public transport in the Netherlands are often considered inefficient from a welfare economic perspective. Bakker and Zwaneveld (2010) show that of about 150 social cost–benefit analyses (CBAs) of public transport projects in the Netherlands conducted in the past decades, only one-third of the projects had a positive benefit–cost ratio. These public transport projects were typically not part of an integrated planning approach, and the CBAs examined the costs and benefits of the transport projects only. In particular, the role of spatial planning or spatial developments in these CBAs was ignored or not made explicit (that is, land use is assumed to be fixed or does not differ between project alternatives). In recent years, however, integrated spatial and transport planning has received more attention in Dutch national policy-making. In 2007, a national policy document, Randstad Urgent, was published, aiming to improve cooperation between national and regional governments and create a joint policy decision-making process for different spatial projects and transport infrastructure projects that are to be realized within the same region (Ministry of Transport Public Works and Water Management, 2007). The policy document focused on 40 projects within the Randstad Area, the most urbanized region in the western part of the Netherlands. The aim of this new approach is to speed up the decision-making process and increase the social benefit–cost ratio of the projects. In this chapter, we examine the RAAM project (‘Rijksbesluiten Amsterdam – Almere – Markermeer’), the largest integrated policy project included in Randstad Urgent. The project involves adding 60 000 dwellings and 100 000 jobs and major transport investments in the corridor between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Amsterdam and Almere, located 30 kilometres east of Amsterdam (see Figure 8.1). Almere would nearly double in size from its current 190 000 to 350 000 inhabitants by 2030. Local governments developed three spatial policy alternatives for the development of Almere with tailored public transport investment programmes. Almere is a new town built on reclaimed land (a polder) with two bridges linking two motorways (A6 and A27) and a railway (parallel to the A6) linking to the mainland. These road connections are already severely congested and rail capacity is insufficient to increase train frequencies substantially. Doubling the population of Almere is not considered feasible without major infrastructure expansion. Transport investments are thus seen of crucial importance to the future population growth of Almere.",
    author = "Geurs, {Karst T.} and {de Bok}, Michiel and Barry Zondag",
    year = "2012",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.4337/9781781000113.00016",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781781000106",
    series = "NECTAR Series on Transportation and Communications Networks Research",
    publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.",
    pages = "135--153",
    editor = "Geurs, {Karst T.} and Krizek, {Kevin J.} and Aura Reggiani",
    booktitle = "Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    Geurs, KT, de Bok, M & Zondag, B 2012, Accessibility benefi ts of integrated land use and public transport policy plans in the netherlands. in KT Geurs, KJ Krizek & A Reggiani (eds), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning: Challenges for Europe and North America. NECTAR Series on Transportation and Communications Networks Research, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., pp. 135-153. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781000113.00016

    Accessibility benefi ts of integrated land use and public transport policy plans in the netherlands. / Geurs, Karst T.; de Bok, Michiel; Zondag, Barry.

    Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning: Challenges for Europe and North America. ed. / Karst T. Geurs; Kevin J. Krizek; Aura Reggiani. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2012. p. 135-153 (NECTAR Series on Transportation and Communications Networks Research).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Accessibility benefi ts of integrated land use and public transport policy plans in the netherlands

    AU - Geurs, Karst T.

    AU - de Bok, Michiel

    AU - Zondag, Barry

    PY - 2012/1/1

    Y1 - 2012/1/1

    N2 - Major investments in public transport in the Netherlands are often considered inefficient from a welfare economic perspective. Bakker and Zwaneveld (2010) show that of about 150 social cost–benefit analyses (CBAs) of public transport projects in the Netherlands conducted in the past decades, only one-third of the projects had a positive benefit–cost ratio. These public transport projects were typically not part of an integrated planning approach, and the CBAs examined the costs and benefits of the transport projects only. In particular, the role of spatial planning or spatial developments in these CBAs was ignored or not made explicit (that is, land use is assumed to be fixed or does not differ between project alternatives). In recent years, however, integrated spatial and transport planning has received more attention in Dutch national policy-making. In 2007, a national policy document, Randstad Urgent, was published, aiming to improve cooperation between national and regional governments and create a joint policy decision-making process for different spatial projects and transport infrastructure projects that are to be realized within the same region (Ministry of Transport Public Works and Water Management, 2007). The policy document focused on 40 projects within the Randstad Area, the most urbanized region in the western part of the Netherlands. The aim of this new approach is to speed up the decision-making process and increase the social benefit–cost ratio of the projects. In this chapter, we examine the RAAM project (‘Rijksbesluiten Amsterdam – Almere – Markermeer’), the largest integrated policy project included in Randstad Urgent. The project involves adding 60 000 dwellings and 100 000 jobs and major transport investments in the corridor between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Amsterdam and Almere, located 30 kilometres east of Amsterdam (see Figure 8.1). Almere would nearly double in size from its current 190 000 to 350 000 inhabitants by 2030. Local governments developed three spatial policy alternatives for the development of Almere with tailored public transport investment programmes. Almere is a new town built on reclaimed land (a polder) with two bridges linking two motorways (A6 and A27) and a railway (parallel to the A6) linking to the mainland. These road connections are already severely congested and rail capacity is insufficient to increase train frequencies substantially. Doubling the population of Almere is not considered feasible without major infrastructure expansion. Transport investments are thus seen of crucial importance to the future population growth of Almere.

    AB - Major investments in public transport in the Netherlands are often considered inefficient from a welfare economic perspective. Bakker and Zwaneveld (2010) show that of about 150 social cost–benefit analyses (CBAs) of public transport projects in the Netherlands conducted in the past decades, only one-third of the projects had a positive benefit–cost ratio. These public transport projects were typically not part of an integrated planning approach, and the CBAs examined the costs and benefits of the transport projects only. In particular, the role of spatial planning or spatial developments in these CBAs was ignored or not made explicit (that is, land use is assumed to be fixed or does not differ between project alternatives). In recent years, however, integrated spatial and transport planning has received more attention in Dutch national policy-making. In 2007, a national policy document, Randstad Urgent, was published, aiming to improve cooperation between national and regional governments and create a joint policy decision-making process for different spatial projects and transport infrastructure projects that are to be realized within the same region (Ministry of Transport Public Works and Water Management, 2007). The policy document focused on 40 projects within the Randstad Area, the most urbanized region in the western part of the Netherlands. The aim of this new approach is to speed up the decision-making process and increase the social benefit–cost ratio of the projects. In this chapter, we examine the RAAM project (‘Rijksbesluiten Amsterdam – Almere – Markermeer’), the largest integrated policy project included in Randstad Urgent. The project involves adding 60 000 dwellings and 100 000 jobs and major transport investments in the corridor between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Amsterdam and Almere, located 30 kilometres east of Amsterdam (see Figure 8.1). Almere would nearly double in size from its current 190 000 to 350 000 inhabitants by 2030. Local governments developed three spatial policy alternatives for the development of Almere with tailored public transport investment programmes. Almere is a new town built on reclaimed land (a polder) with two bridges linking two motorways (A6 and A27) and a railway (parallel to the A6) linking to the mainland. These road connections are already severely congested and rail capacity is insufficient to increase train frequencies substantially. Doubling the population of Almere is not considered feasible without major infrastructure expansion. Transport investments are thus seen of crucial importance to the future population growth of Almere.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881801900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4337/9781781000113.00016

    DO - 10.4337/9781781000113.00016

    M3 - Chapter

    AN - SCOPUS:84881801900

    SN - 9781781000106

    T3 - NECTAR Series on Transportation and Communications Networks Research

    SP - 135

    EP - 153

    BT - Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning

    A2 - Geurs, Karst T.

    A2 - Krizek, Kevin J.

    A2 - Reggiani, Aura

    PB - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    ER -

    Geurs KT, de Bok M, Zondag B. Accessibility benefi ts of integrated land use and public transport policy plans in the netherlands. In Geurs KT, Krizek KJ, Reggiani A, editors, Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning: Challenges for Europe and North America. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2012. p. 135-153. (NECTAR Series on Transportation and Communications Networks Research). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781000113.00016