Advancing multilevel thinking in human resource management research: applications and guidelines

Abstract

Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) researchers have recently turned their attention to using various levels of analysis in examining the relationship between HRM and performance. Despite several calls for research that integrates multiple levels of analysis, HRM research has yet to apply a multilevel approach to its full advantage. In our view, the paucity of multilevel research is rooted in the lack of what we label multilevel thinking: the application of multilevel principles. In this conceptual paper, we develop 9 guidelines based on tailored multilevel HRM principles that offer a course of action for scholars who are interested in conducting multilevel HRM research. Following Kozlowski and Klein (2000), we build these principles around the what, how, where, when, and why questions in multilevel HRM research. Based on an analysis of 88 empirical multilevel HRM studies, we identify the approaches commonly applied when using multilevel principles, explain the weaknesses in current multilevel HRM studies, and offer what we consider good examples of a rigorous approach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-415
JournalHuman resource management review
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Levels of analysis

Keywords

  • METIS-321928
  • IR-104060

Cite this

@article{d10e49e71c6b4d2a9edd5acbca2d18ac,
title = "Advancing multilevel thinking in human resource management research: applications and guidelines",
abstract = "Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) researchers have recently turned their attention to using various levels of analysis in examining the relationship between HRM and performance. Despite several calls for research that integrates multiple levels of analysis, HRM research has yet to apply a multilevel approach to its full advantage. In our view, the paucity of multilevel research is rooted in the lack of what we label multilevel thinking: the application of multilevel principles. In this conceptual paper, we develop 9 guidelines based on tailored multilevel HRM principles that offer a course of action for scholars who are interested in conducting multilevel HRM research. Following Kozlowski and Klein (2000), we build these principles around the what, how, where, when, and why questions in multilevel HRM research. Based on an analysis of 88 empirical multilevel HRM studies, we identify the approaches commonly applied when using multilevel principles, explain the weaknesses in current multilevel HRM studies, and offer what we consider good examples of a rigorous approach.",
keywords = "METIS-321928, IR-104060",
author = "Maarten Renkema and Meijerink, {Jeroen Gerard} and Tatiana Bondarouk",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.001",
volume = "27",
pages = "397--415",
journal = "Human resource management review",
issn = "1053-4822",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing multilevel thinking in human resource management research: applications and guidelines

AU - Renkema,Maarten

AU - Meijerink,Jeroen Gerard

AU - Bondarouk,Tatiana

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) researchers have recently turned their attention to using various levels of analysis in examining the relationship between HRM and performance. Despite several calls for research that integrates multiple levels of analysis, HRM research has yet to apply a multilevel approach to its full advantage. In our view, the paucity of multilevel research is rooted in the lack of what we label multilevel thinking: the application of multilevel principles. In this conceptual paper, we develop 9 guidelines based on tailored multilevel HRM principles that offer a course of action for scholars who are interested in conducting multilevel HRM research. Following Kozlowski and Klein (2000), we build these principles around the what, how, where, when, and why questions in multilevel HRM research. Based on an analysis of 88 empirical multilevel HRM studies, we identify the approaches commonly applied when using multilevel principles, explain the weaknesses in current multilevel HRM studies, and offer what we consider good examples of a rigorous approach.

AB - Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) researchers have recently turned their attention to using various levels of analysis in examining the relationship between HRM and performance. Despite several calls for research that integrates multiple levels of analysis, HRM research has yet to apply a multilevel approach to its full advantage. In our view, the paucity of multilevel research is rooted in the lack of what we label multilevel thinking: the application of multilevel principles. In this conceptual paper, we develop 9 guidelines based on tailored multilevel HRM principles that offer a course of action for scholars who are interested in conducting multilevel HRM research. Following Kozlowski and Klein (2000), we build these principles around the what, how, where, when, and why questions in multilevel HRM research. Based on an analysis of 88 empirical multilevel HRM studies, we identify the approaches commonly applied when using multilevel principles, explain the weaknesses in current multilevel HRM studies, and offer what we consider good examples of a rigorous approach.

KW - METIS-321928

KW - IR-104060

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 397

EP - 415

JO - Human resource management review

T2 - Human resource management review

JF - Human resource management review

SN - 1053-4822

IS - 3

ER -