TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing Soil Assessment
T2 - Vision-Based Monitoring for Subgrade Quality and Dynamic Modulus
AU - Faizi, Koohyar
AU - Evans, Robert
AU - Kromanis, Rolands
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Accurate evaluation of subgrade behaviour under dynamic loading is essential for the long-term performance of transport infrastructure. While the Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD) is commonly used to assess subgrade stiffness, it provides only a single stiffness value and may not fully capture the time-dependent response of soil. This study presents an image-based vision system developed to monitor soil surface displacements during loading, enabling more detailed analysis of dynamic behaviour. The system incorporates high-speed cameras and MATLAB-based computer vision algorithms to track vertical movement of the plate during impact. Laboratory and field experiments were conducted to evaluate the system’s performance, with results compared directly to those from the LWD. A strong correlation was observed (R2 = 0.9901), with differences between the two methods ranging from 0.8% to 13%, confirming the accuracy of the vision-based measurements despite the limited dataset. The findings highlight the system’s potential as a practical and cost-effective tool for enhancing subgrade assessment, particularly in applications requiring improved understanding of ground response under repeated or transient loading.
AB - Accurate evaluation of subgrade behaviour under dynamic loading is essential for the long-term performance of transport infrastructure. While the Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD) is commonly used to assess subgrade stiffness, it provides only a single stiffness value and may not fully capture the time-dependent response of soil. This study presents an image-based vision system developed to monitor soil surface displacements during loading, enabling more detailed analysis of dynamic behaviour. The system incorporates high-speed cameras and MATLAB-based computer vision algorithms to track vertical movement of the plate during impact. Laboratory and field experiments were conducted to evaluate the system’s performance, with results compared directly to those from the LWD. A strong correlation was observed (R2 = 0.9901), with differences between the two methods ranging from 0.8% to 13%, confirming the accuracy of the vision-based measurements despite the limited dataset. The findings highlight the system’s potential as a practical and cost-effective tool for enhancing subgrade assessment, particularly in applications requiring improved understanding of ground response under repeated or transient loading.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025957097
U2 - 10.3390/geotechnics5040067
DO - 10.3390/geotechnics5040067
M3 - Article
SN - 2673-7094
VL - 5
JO - Geotechnics
JF - Geotechnics
IS - 4
M1 - 67
ER -