Abstract
In this paper, we compare a shift register (SR) to a delay-locked loop (DLL) for flexible multiphase clock generation, and motivate why a SR is not only more flexible but often also better. For a given power budget, we show that a SR almost always generates less jitter than a DLL, assuming both are realized with current-mode logic. This is due to differences in jitter accumulation and the possibility to choose latch delays in a SR much smaller thanthe delays of DLL elements. For N-phase clock generation, a SR also functions as a divide-by-N and requires a voltage-controlled oscillator with N-times higher frequency. However, this does not necessary lead to more power consumption and can even have advantages like higher Q and less area for the inductors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 244-248 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | IEEE transactions on circuits and systems II: express briefs |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2008 |
Keywords
- 2020 OA procedure