Advertising: Company Asset or Liability? A Systematic Literature Review on Deception

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research on deception in advertising has expanded over the last 50 years, yet existing reviews focus on specific forms of deception in advertising and rarely integrate the individual, organisational and contextual factors that shape deception in advertising. This paper systematically reviews 193 publications on deception in advertising, using an integrated ADO-TCM framework. Based on the insights from the framework, this review proposes a comprehensive conceptual model that captures the interactions between consumer and brand-level processes, clarifying the pathways through which deceptive advertising operates. The review also identifies critical gaps in the literature, including the strong theoretical emphasis on the Persuasion Knowledge Theory (PKT), the limited work in non-Western contexts, the dependence on self-reported measures and the underuse of neuroscientific methods. These gaps present promising avenues for future research, such as incorporating tools like the electroencephalogram (EEG) or virtual reality (VR) to examine consumers' subconscious responses to deceptive advertising.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70187
JournalInternational Journal of Consumer Studies
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2026

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Advertising
  • Brand behaviour
  • Consumer behaviour
  • Deception
  • False
  • Framework-based systematic review
  • Misleading

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advertising: Company Asset or Liability? A Systematic Literature Review on Deception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this