Ageing populations and travel

Gamze Dane, Anna Grigolon, Soora Rasouli, Harry Timmermans, Dujuan Yang

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The effectiveness of sustainable transport policies ultimately depends on the response of different lifecycle groups to these policies. This chapter is concerned with one such lifecycle group: the elderly. They are also known in the literature as ‘solitary survivors’ or ‘mature’ groups (Wells and Gubar, 1966; Lawson, 1991; Fodness, 1992). It is an interesting group for a variety of reasons. First, the elderly need to adjust to changing needs and a shifting institutional context. After retirement they may have more discretionary time, they may be empty-nesters, although their household caring tasks may perhaps be substituted by grandparenting tasks. The new generation of elderly is said to have accumulated more wealth and resources (e.g., Spinney et al., 2009). Moreover, in general, their health is better than that of previous generations of elderly, giving them more opportunities to stay active and travel (Ziegler and Schwanen, 2011). On the other hand, they are less flexible in adjusting to changes, i.e., diminishing public urban facilities and transportation resources (e.g., Rosenbloom, 2001; Collia et al., 2003; Hildebrand, 2003). These considerations suggest they are more likely to continue travelling, with detrimental effects on sustainable transport policy ambitions. Little empirical evidence is, however, known about the travel behaviour of the elderly. This chapter summarises results of our previous analyses and activity-travel behaviour of this lifecycle group and adds the results of some new analyses that were specifically conducted for this chapter.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook on Transport and Development
EditorsRobin Rickman, Moshe Givoni, David Bonilla, David Banister
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages556-570
ISBN (Electronic)978-0-85793726-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

travel
travel behavior
Group
retirement
resources
health
evidence

Cite this

Dane, G., Grigolon, A., Rasouli, S., Timmermans, H., & Yang, D. (2015). Ageing populations and travel. In R. Rickman, M. Givoni, D. Bonilla, & D. Banister (Eds.), Handbook on Transport and Development (pp. 556-570). [37] Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857937261.00045
Dane, Gamze ; Grigolon, Anna ; Rasouli, Soora ; Timmermans, Harry ; Yang, Dujuan. / Ageing populations and travel. Handbook on Transport and Development. editor / Robin Rickman ; Moshe Givoni ; David Bonilla ; David Banister. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. pp. 556-570
@inbook{170c9d9434364156af08587f0f518937,
title = "Ageing populations and travel",
abstract = "The effectiveness of sustainable transport policies ultimately depends on the response of different lifecycle groups to these policies. This chapter is concerned with one such lifecycle group: the elderly. They are also known in the literature as ‘solitary survivors’ or ‘mature’ groups (Wells and Gubar, 1966; Lawson, 1991; Fodness, 1992). It is an interesting group for a variety of reasons. First, the elderly need to adjust to changing needs and a shifting institutional context. After retirement they may have more discretionary time, they may be empty-nesters, although their household caring tasks may perhaps be substituted by grandparenting tasks. The new generation of elderly is said to have accumulated more wealth and resources (e.g., Spinney et al., 2009). Moreover, in general, their health is better than that of previous generations of elderly, giving them more opportunities to stay active and travel (Ziegler and Schwanen, 2011). On the other hand, they are less flexible in adjusting to changes, i.e., diminishing public urban facilities and transportation resources (e.g., Rosenbloom, 2001; Collia et al., 2003; Hildebrand, 2003). These considerations suggest they are more likely to continue travelling, with detrimental effects on sustainable transport policy ambitions. Little empirical evidence is, however, known about the travel behaviour of the elderly. This chapter summarises results of our previous analyses and activity-travel behaviour of this lifecycle group and adds the results of some new analyses that were specifically conducted for this chapter.",
author = "Gamze Dane and Anna Grigolon and Soora Rasouli and Harry Timmermans and Dujuan Yang",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.4337/9780857937261.00045",
language = "English",
pages = "556--570",
editor = "Robin Rickman and Moshe Givoni and David Bonilla and David Banister",
booktitle = "Handbook on Transport and Development",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",

}

Dane, G, Grigolon, A, Rasouli, S, Timmermans, H & Yang, D 2015, Ageing populations and travel. in R Rickman, M Givoni, D Bonilla & D Banister (eds), Handbook on Transport and Development., 37, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 556-570. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857937261.00045

Ageing populations and travel. / Dane, Gamze; Grigolon, Anna; Rasouli, Soora; Timmermans, Harry; Yang, Dujuan.

Handbook on Transport and Development. ed. / Robin Rickman; Moshe Givoni; David Bonilla; David Banister. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. p. 556-570 37.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ageing populations and travel

AU - Dane, Gamze

AU - Grigolon, Anna

AU - Rasouli, Soora

AU - Timmermans, Harry

AU - Yang, Dujuan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The effectiveness of sustainable transport policies ultimately depends on the response of different lifecycle groups to these policies. This chapter is concerned with one such lifecycle group: the elderly. They are also known in the literature as ‘solitary survivors’ or ‘mature’ groups (Wells and Gubar, 1966; Lawson, 1991; Fodness, 1992). It is an interesting group for a variety of reasons. First, the elderly need to adjust to changing needs and a shifting institutional context. After retirement they may have more discretionary time, they may be empty-nesters, although their household caring tasks may perhaps be substituted by grandparenting tasks. The new generation of elderly is said to have accumulated more wealth and resources (e.g., Spinney et al., 2009). Moreover, in general, their health is better than that of previous generations of elderly, giving them more opportunities to stay active and travel (Ziegler and Schwanen, 2011). On the other hand, they are less flexible in adjusting to changes, i.e., diminishing public urban facilities and transportation resources (e.g., Rosenbloom, 2001; Collia et al., 2003; Hildebrand, 2003). These considerations suggest they are more likely to continue travelling, with detrimental effects on sustainable transport policy ambitions. Little empirical evidence is, however, known about the travel behaviour of the elderly. This chapter summarises results of our previous analyses and activity-travel behaviour of this lifecycle group and adds the results of some new analyses that were specifically conducted for this chapter.

AB - The effectiveness of sustainable transport policies ultimately depends on the response of different lifecycle groups to these policies. This chapter is concerned with one such lifecycle group: the elderly. They are also known in the literature as ‘solitary survivors’ or ‘mature’ groups (Wells and Gubar, 1966; Lawson, 1991; Fodness, 1992). It is an interesting group for a variety of reasons. First, the elderly need to adjust to changing needs and a shifting institutional context. After retirement they may have more discretionary time, they may be empty-nesters, although their household caring tasks may perhaps be substituted by grandparenting tasks. The new generation of elderly is said to have accumulated more wealth and resources (e.g., Spinney et al., 2009). Moreover, in general, their health is better than that of previous generations of elderly, giving them more opportunities to stay active and travel (Ziegler and Schwanen, 2011). On the other hand, they are less flexible in adjusting to changes, i.e., diminishing public urban facilities and transportation resources (e.g., Rosenbloom, 2001; Collia et al., 2003; Hildebrand, 2003). These considerations suggest they are more likely to continue travelling, with detrimental effects on sustainable transport policy ambitions. Little empirical evidence is, however, known about the travel behaviour of the elderly. This chapter summarises results of our previous analyses and activity-travel behaviour of this lifecycle group and adds the results of some new analyses that were specifically conducted for this chapter.

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2015/chap/grigolon_age.pdf

U2 - 10.4337/9780857937261.00045

DO - 10.4337/9780857937261.00045

M3 - Chapter

SP - 556

EP - 570

BT - Handbook on Transport and Development

A2 - Rickman, Robin

A2 - Givoni, Moshe

A2 - Bonilla, David

A2 - Banister, David

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

ER -

Dane G, Grigolon A, Rasouli S, Timmermans H, Yang D. Ageing populations and travel. In Rickman R, Givoni M, Bonilla D, Banister D, editors, Handbook on Transport and Development. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2015. p. 556-570. 37 https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857937261.00045