Agency and industry : Charles C. Gillispie’s "The Natural History of Industry," then and now

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

111 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Charles Coulston Gillispie’s “The Discovery of the Leblanc Process” and “The Natural History of Industry” (Isis 48 (1957): 152–70, 398–407) were unique, yet characteristic of their era. Together, they engaged with discussions of the historical relationship between science and industry. While influential contemporaries favored a narrative structured by Anglo-centrism and the linear model, Gillispie turned to France and offered a different view. Similar to sociologist Robert Merton, Gillispie argued that French Enlightenment scientists (and scientists generally) served society and the state as educators and managers in exchange for support for their essentially disinterested pursuit of scientific knowledge. Organizing useful knowledge to inspire material and intellectual progress through teaching and encyclopedic publications was therefore part of their brief. Gillispie developed this view further in the 1980s, arguing against those who would grant agency to non-humans as well as human actors. His work is thus of continuing interest for current debates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)922-941
JournalTechnology and culture
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Industry
Teaching
Managers
France
Organizing
1980s
Robert Merton
Sociologists
Pursuit
Nonhuman
Isis
Scientific Knowledge
Educators
Enlightenment

Keywords

  • IR-88705
  • METIS-301037

Cite this

@article{5ee9ae494916437bba167ea5c524f0be,
title = "Agency and industry : Charles C. Gillispie’s {"}The Natural History of Industry,{"} then and now",
abstract = "Charles Coulston Gillispie’s “The Discovery of the Leblanc Process” and “The Natural History of Industry” (Isis 48 (1957): 152–70, 398–407) were unique, yet characteristic of their era. Together, they engaged with discussions of the historical relationship between science and industry. While influential contemporaries favored a narrative structured by Anglo-centrism and the linear model, Gillispie turned to France and offered a different view. Similar to sociologist Robert Merton, Gillispie argued that French Enlightenment scientists (and scientists generally) served society and the state as educators and managers in exchange for support for their essentially disinterested pursuit of scientific knowledge. Organizing useful knowledge to inspire material and intellectual progress through teaching and encyclopedic publications was therefore part of their brief. Gillispie developed this view further in the 1980s, arguing against those who would grant agency to non-humans as well as human actors. His work is thus of continuing interest for current debates.",
keywords = "IR-88705, METIS-301037",
author = "Roberts, {Lissa L.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1353/tech.2013.0141",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "922--941",
journal = "Technology and culture",
issn = "0040-165X",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

Agency and industry : Charles C. Gillispie’s "The Natural History of Industry," then and now. / Roberts, Lissa L.

In: Technology and culture, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2013, p. 922-941.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agency and industry : Charles C. Gillispie’s "The Natural History of Industry," then and now

AU - Roberts, Lissa L.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Charles Coulston Gillispie’s “The Discovery of the Leblanc Process” and “The Natural History of Industry” (Isis 48 (1957): 152–70, 398–407) were unique, yet characteristic of their era. Together, they engaged with discussions of the historical relationship between science and industry. While influential contemporaries favored a narrative structured by Anglo-centrism and the linear model, Gillispie turned to France and offered a different view. Similar to sociologist Robert Merton, Gillispie argued that French Enlightenment scientists (and scientists generally) served society and the state as educators and managers in exchange for support for their essentially disinterested pursuit of scientific knowledge. Organizing useful knowledge to inspire material and intellectual progress through teaching and encyclopedic publications was therefore part of their brief. Gillispie developed this view further in the 1980s, arguing against those who would grant agency to non-humans as well as human actors. His work is thus of continuing interest for current debates.

AB - Charles Coulston Gillispie’s “The Discovery of the Leblanc Process” and “The Natural History of Industry” (Isis 48 (1957): 152–70, 398–407) were unique, yet characteristic of their era. Together, they engaged with discussions of the historical relationship between science and industry. While influential contemporaries favored a narrative structured by Anglo-centrism and the linear model, Gillispie turned to France and offered a different view. Similar to sociologist Robert Merton, Gillispie argued that French Enlightenment scientists (and scientists generally) served society and the state as educators and managers in exchange for support for their essentially disinterested pursuit of scientific knowledge. Organizing useful knowledge to inspire material and intellectual progress through teaching and encyclopedic publications was therefore part of their brief. Gillispie developed this view further in the 1980s, arguing against those who would grant agency to non-humans as well as human actors. His work is thus of continuing interest for current debates.

KW - IR-88705

KW - METIS-301037

U2 - 10.1353/tech.2013.0141

DO - 10.1353/tech.2013.0141

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 922

EP - 941

JO - Technology and culture

JF - Technology and culture

SN - 0040-165X

IS - 4

ER -