Agile Process Systems Engineering (PSE) education – 2. How to teach to achieve desired outcomes mastery by graduates

Daniel R. Lewin, Ian T. Cameron, Emilia M. Kondili, Grégoire Léonard, Seyed Soheil Mansouri, Fernando G. Martins, Luis Ricardez-Sandoval, Hirokazu Sugiyama, Edwin Zondervan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study is the second part of a contribution addressing the appropriate content of process systems engineering (PSE) curriculum (the “what”) and how best it should be taught, so that our graduates are equipped to effectively apply their knowledge (the “how”). The two-part contribution presents the collective views and perceptions of the responders from all over the world to surveys as well as the collective view of the authors. This paper presents the “how” – how best to instruct our students in all matters PSE, given the availability of teaching technologies, and the time available to effectively train our students.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputer Aided Chemical Engineering
PublisherElsevier
Pages1675-1680
Number of pages6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Publication series

NameComputer Aided Chemical Engineering
Volume51
ISSN (Print)1570-7946

Keywords

  • active learning
  • curriculum
  • PSE education
  • NLA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Agile Process Systems Engineering (PSE) education – 2. How to teach to achieve desired outcomes mastery by graduates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this