TY - JOUR
T1 - Aligning Concerns in Telecare
T2 - Three Concepts to Guide the Design of Patient-Centred E-Health
AU - Andersen, Tariq Osman
AU - Bansler, Jørgen Peter
AU - Kensing, Finn
AU - Moll, Jonas
AU - Mønsted, Troels
AU - Nielsen, Karen Dam
AU - Nielsen, Olav Wendelboe
AU - Petersen, Helen Høgh
AU - Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup
N1 - Springer deal
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - The design of patient-centred e-health services embodies an inherent tension between the concerns of clinicians and those of patients. Clinicians’ concerns are related to professional issues to do with diagnosing and curing disease in accordance with accepted medical standards. In contrast, patients’ concerns typically relate to personal experience and quality of life issues. It is about their identity, their hopes, their fears and their need to maintain a meaningful life. This divergence of concerns presents a fundamental challenge for designers of patient-centred e-health services. We explore this challenge in the context of chronic illness and telecare. Based on insights from medical phenomenology as well as our own experience with designing an e-health service for patients with chronic heart disease, we emphasise the importance – and difficulty – of aligning the concerns of patients and clinicians. To deal with this, we propose a set of concepts for analysing concerns related to the design of e-health services: A concern is (1) meaningful if it is relevant and makes sense to both patients and clinicians, (2) actionable if clinicians or patients – at least in principle – are able to take appropriate action to deal with it, and (3) feasible if it is easy and convenient to do so within the organisational and social context. We conclude with a call for a more participatory and iterative approach to the design of patient-centred e-health services.
AB - The design of patient-centred e-health services embodies an inherent tension between the concerns of clinicians and those of patients. Clinicians’ concerns are related to professional issues to do with diagnosing and curing disease in accordance with accepted medical standards. In contrast, patients’ concerns typically relate to personal experience and quality of life issues. It is about their identity, their hopes, their fears and their need to maintain a meaningful life. This divergence of concerns presents a fundamental challenge for designers of patient-centred e-health services. We explore this challenge in the context of chronic illness and telecare. Based on insights from medical phenomenology as well as our own experience with designing an e-health service for patients with chronic heart disease, we emphasise the importance – and difficulty – of aligning the concerns of patients and clinicians. To deal with this, we propose a set of concepts for analysing concerns related to the design of e-health services: A concern is (1) meaningful if it is relevant and makes sense to both patients and clinicians, (2) actionable if clinicians or patients – at least in principle – are able to take appropriate action to deal with it, and (3) feasible if it is easy and convenient to do so within the organisational and social context. We conclude with a call for a more participatory and iterative approach to the design of patient-centred e-health services.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - Medical phenomenology
KW - Participatory design
KW - Patient-centred e-health
KW - Patient-clinician interaction
KW - Patient-provider relationship
KW - Alignment of concerns
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047114032&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10606-018-9309-1
DO - 10.1007/s10606-018-9309-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047114032
SN - 0925-9724
VL - 28
SP - 1039
EP - 1072
JO - Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal
JF - Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal
IS - 1
ER -