Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Qualitative researchers often use other principles for judging the quality of their study than quantitative researchers. This inhibits a straightforward assessment of the quality and comparability of different types of studies, as well as decision-making about their usefulness for further research and practice. In this article, we question the use of alternative criteria, and argue for one coherent and inclusive framework of quality criteria for both qualitative and quantitative studies. We developed such a framework, based on a comparison and operationalization of different criteria, and the elaboration of procedures to realize them. Its usability is demonstrated by the application in a qualitative case study research and a mixed-methods study. This framework enhances advancing and judging the basic quality of any type of scientific research, promoting the assessment of the quality and hence usability of studies for further research or decision-making about practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1727-1751
JournalQuality and quantity
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Qualitative Research
qualitative research
Alternatives
Usability
Case Study Research
Decision Making
decision making
Mixed Methods
operationalization
Standards
Framework

Keywords

  • IR-83270
  • METIS-268365

Cite this

@article{5b1c4b51d3684025b03c417b9d4511d9,
title = "Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?",
abstract = "Qualitative researchers often use other principles for judging the quality of their study than quantitative researchers. This inhibits a straightforward assessment of the quality and comparability of different types of studies, as well as decision-making about their usefulness for further research and practice. In this article, we question the use of alternative criteria, and argue for one coherent and inclusive framework of quality criteria for both qualitative and quantitative studies. We developed such a framework, based on a comparison and operationalization of different criteria, and the elaboration of procedures to realize them. Its usability is demonstrated by the application in a qualitative case study research and a mixed-methods study. This framework enhances advancing and judging the basic quality of any type of scientific research, promoting the assessment of the quality and hence usability of studies for further research or decision-making about practice.",
keywords = "IR-83270, METIS-268365",
author = "Poortman, {Cindy Louise} and Kim Schildkamp",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s11135-011-9555-5",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1727--1751",
journal = "Quality and quantity",
issn = "0033-5177",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

Alternative quality standards in qualitative research? / Poortman, Cindy Louise; Schildkamp, Kim.

In: Quality and quantity, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2011, p. 1727-1751.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?

AU - Poortman, Cindy Louise

AU - Schildkamp, Kim

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Qualitative researchers often use other principles for judging the quality of their study than quantitative researchers. This inhibits a straightforward assessment of the quality and comparability of different types of studies, as well as decision-making about their usefulness for further research and practice. In this article, we question the use of alternative criteria, and argue for one coherent and inclusive framework of quality criteria for both qualitative and quantitative studies. We developed such a framework, based on a comparison and operationalization of different criteria, and the elaboration of procedures to realize them. Its usability is demonstrated by the application in a qualitative case study research and a mixed-methods study. This framework enhances advancing and judging the basic quality of any type of scientific research, promoting the assessment of the quality and hence usability of studies for further research or decision-making about practice.

AB - Qualitative researchers often use other principles for judging the quality of their study than quantitative researchers. This inhibits a straightforward assessment of the quality and comparability of different types of studies, as well as decision-making about their usefulness for further research and practice. In this article, we question the use of alternative criteria, and argue for one coherent and inclusive framework of quality criteria for both qualitative and quantitative studies. We developed such a framework, based on a comparison and operationalization of different criteria, and the elaboration of procedures to realize them. Its usability is demonstrated by the application in a qualitative case study research and a mixed-methods study. This framework enhances advancing and judging the basic quality of any type of scientific research, promoting the assessment of the quality and hence usability of studies for further research or decision-making about practice.

KW - IR-83270

KW - METIS-268365

U2 - 10.1007/s11135-011-9555-5

DO - 10.1007/s11135-011-9555-5

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 1727

EP - 1751

JO - Quality and quantity

JF - Quality and quantity

SN - 0033-5177

IS - 6

ER -