Ambiguities of ‘doing what works’: how professionals make sense of applying solution-focused support for people with intellectual disabilities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: Solution-focused support (SFS) is an upcoming approach to support people with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, while research shows that clients appreciate this approach, insight into professionals’ experiences and their application of SFS is lacking. This article describes a qualitative study aimed at understanding how professionals make sense of learning and applying SFS, specifically, Cauffman’s Solution Cube. Methods: Logbook files in which professionals reported their experiences with SFS for a full year were qualitatively analyzed in two steps: (1) identification of how professionals assigned successful and unsuccessful applications of SFS, and reflected on what worked and dilemmas arising during this application process, (2) identification of patterns over time in how professionals learned how to deal with the encountered dilemmas. Results: The main dilemma experienced by professionals concerns ‘doing what works’ in conjunction with other dimensions of the Solution Cube. Three overall patterns were identified to address how professionals made sense of learning how to apply SFS over time and deal with ambiguities of ‘doing what works’ in practice: (1) a focus on caring, (2) a focus on empowering, and (3) a focus on balancing between the two. Conclusions: Understanding how professionals deal with SFS over time enables researchers to identify different ways professionals learn SFS, along with the ambiguities they experience about the approach and unintended applications. Implications for implementing SFS and learning facilitators that might help promote a balance between caring and empowerment, specifically for people with ID, are provided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-183
Number of pages14
JournalInternational journal of developmental disabilities
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Disabled Persons
Intellectual Disability
Learning
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Intellectual disabilities
  • Professional learning
  • Solution-focused support
  • Staff training

Cite this

@article{d082dba8341a4174a4828545ad1a1554,
title = "Ambiguities of ‘doing what works’: how professionals make sense of applying solution-focused support for people with intellectual disabilities",
abstract = "Objectives: Solution-focused support (SFS) is an upcoming approach to support people with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, while research shows that clients appreciate this approach, insight into professionals’ experiences and their application of SFS is lacking. This article describes a qualitative study aimed at understanding how professionals make sense of learning and applying SFS, specifically, Cauffman’s Solution Cube. Methods: Logbook files in which professionals reported their experiences with SFS for a full year were qualitatively analyzed in two steps: (1) identification of how professionals assigned successful and unsuccessful applications of SFS, and reflected on what worked and dilemmas arising during this application process, (2) identification of patterns over time in how professionals learned how to deal with the encountered dilemmas. Results: The main dilemma experienced by professionals concerns ‘doing what works’ in conjunction with other dimensions of the Solution Cube. Three overall patterns were identified to address how professionals made sense of learning how to apply SFS over time and deal with ambiguities of ‘doing what works’ in practice: (1) a focus on caring, (2) a focus on empowering, and (3) a focus on balancing between the two. Conclusions: Understanding how professionals deal with SFS over time enables researchers to identify different ways professionals learn SFS, along with the ambiguities they experience about the approach and unintended applications. Implications for implementing SFS and learning facilitators that might help promote a balance between caring and empowerment, specifically for people with ID, are provided.",
keywords = "Intellectual disabilities, Professional learning, Solution-focused support, Staff training",
author = "Lohuis, {Anne Marie} and {van Vuuren}, {Hubrecht A.} and Anneke Sools and Ernst Bohlmeijer",
note = "Open Access",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/20473869.2016.1198102",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "170--183",
journal = "International journal of developmental disabilities",
issn = "2047-3869",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambiguities of ‘doing what works’

T2 - how professionals make sense of applying solution-focused support for people with intellectual disabilities

AU - Lohuis, Anne Marie

AU - van Vuuren, Hubrecht A.

AU - Sools, Anneke

AU - Bohlmeijer, Ernst

N1 - Open Access

PY - 2017/7/3

Y1 - 2017/7/3

N2 - Objectives: Solution-focused support (SFS) is an upcoming approach to support people with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, while research shows that clients appreciate this approach, insight into professionals’ experiences and their application of SFS is lacking. This article describes a qualitative study aimed at understanding how professionals make sense of learning and applying SFS, specifically, Cauffman’s Solution Cube. Methods: Logbook files in which professionals reported their experiences with SFS for a full year were qualitatively analyzed in two steps: (1) identification of how professionals assigned successful and unsuccessful applications of SFS, and reflected on what worked and dilemmas arising during this application process, (2) identification of patterns over time in how professionals learned how to deal with the encountered dilemmas. Results: The main dilemma experienced by professionals concerns ‘doing what works’ in conjunction with other dimensions of the Solution Cube. Three overall patterns were identified to address how professionals made sense of learning how to apply SFS over time and deal with ambiguities of ‘doing what works’ in practice: (1) a focus on caring, (2) a focus on empowering, and (3) a focus on balancing between the two. Conclusions: Understanding how professionals deal with SFS over time enables researchers to identify different ways professionals learn SFS, along with the ambiguities they experience about the approach and unintended applications. Implications for implementing SFS and learning facilitators that might help promote a balance between caring and empowerment, specifically for people with ID, are provided.

AB - Objectives: Solution-focused support (SFS) is an upcoming approach to support people with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, while research shows that clients appreciate this approach, insight into professionals’ experiences and their application of SFS is lacking. This article describes a qualitative study aimed at understanding how professionals make sense of learning and applying SFS, specifically, Cauffman’s Solution Cube. Methods: Logbook files in which professionals reported their experiences with SFS for a full year were qualitatively analyzed in two steps: (1) identification of how professionals assigned successful and unsuccessful applications of SFS, and reflected on what worked and dilemmas arising during this application process, (2) identification of patterns over time in how professionals learned how to deal with the encountered dilemmas. Results: The main dilemma experienced by professionals concerns ‘doing what works’ in conjunction with other dimensions of the Solution Cube. Three overall patterns were identified to address how professionals made sense of learning how to apply SFS over time and deal with ambiguities of ‘doing what works’ in practice: (1) a focus on caring, (2) a focus on empowering, and (3) a focus on balancing between the two. Conclusions: Understanding how professionals deal with SFS over time enables researchers to identify different ways professionals learn SFS, along with the ambiguities they experience about the approach and unintended applications. Implications for implementing SFS and learning facilitators that might help promote a balance between caring and empowerment, specifically for people with ID, are provided.

KW - Intellectual disabilities

KW - Professional learning

KW - Solution-focused support

KW - Staff training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981554855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/20473869.2016.1198102

DO - 10.1080/20473869.2016.1198102

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 170

EP - 183

JO - International journal of developmental disabilities

JF - International journal of developmental disabilities

SN - 2047-3869

IS - 3

ER -