An assessment of the differences between spatial resolution and grid size for the SMAP enhanced soil moisture product over homogeneous sites

A. Colliander* (Corresponding Author), Thomas J. Jackson, S. K. Chan, Peggy O'Neill, R. Bindlish, M.H. Cosh, T. Caldwell, J.P. Walker, A. Berg, H. McNairn, M. Thibeault, José Martínez-fernández, Karsten H. Jensen, J. Asanuma, M. S. Seyfried, D.D. Bosch, P.J. Starks, Chandra D. Holifield Collins, J.H. Prueger, Z. SuE. Lopez-Baeza, S. H. Yueh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Satellite-based passive microwave remote sensing typically involves a scanning antenna that makes measurements at irregularly spaced locations. These locations can change on a day to day basis. Soil moisture products derived from satellite-based passive microwave remote sensing are usually resampled to a fixed Earth grid that facilitates their use in applications. In many cases the grid size is finer than the actual spatial resolution of the observation, and often this difference is not well understood by the user. Here, this issue was examined for the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) enhanced version of the passive-based soil moisture product, which has a grid size of 9-km and a nominal spatial resolution of 33-km. In situ observations from core validation sites were used to compute comparison metrics. For sites that satisfied the established reliability and scaling criteria, the impact of validating the 9-km grid product with in situ data collected over a 9-km versus a 33-km domain was very small for the sites studied (0.039 m3/m3 unbiased root mean square difference for the 9-km case versus 0.037 m3/m3 for the 33-km case). This result does not mean that the resolution of the product is 9-km but that for the conditions studied here the soil moisture estimated from in situ observations over 9-km is a close approximation of the soil moisture estimated from in situ observations over the 33-km resolution. The implication is that using the enhanced SMAP product at its grid resolution of 9-km should not introduce large errors in most applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-70
Number of pages6
JournalRemote sensing of environment
Volume207
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • In situ
  • SMAP
  • Soil moisture
  • Spatial resolution
  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An assessment of the differences between spatial resolution and grid size for the SMAP enhanced soil moisture product over homogeneous sites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this