An evaluation and critique of current rankings

Gero Federkeil, Donald F. Westerheijden

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter raises the question of whether university league tables deliver relevant information to one of their key target groups – students. It examines the inherent biases and weaknesses in the methodologies of the major rankings and argues that the concentration on a single indicator of excellence (research) and single function of an institution ignores the diverse needs and motivations of prospective students in choosing a university. It also raises the issue of rankings that proclaim the ‘excellence’ of an entire institution, which may not be an accurate reflection of the performance of individual departments. The authors then present some principles and examples of good practice in ranking and discuss alternative classification systems
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMultidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-multirank
EditorsFranciscus A. van Vught, Frank Ziegele
Place of PublicationDordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York
PublisherSpringer
Pages39-70
Number of pages194
ISBN (Print)978-94-007-3004-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Publication series

NameHigher Education Dynamics
PublisherSpringer
Number37
Volume37

Fingerprint

ranking
evaluation
university
target group
best practice
student
methodology
trend
performance

Keywords

  • METIS-286717
  • IR-84399

Cite this

Federkeil, G., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2012). An evaluation and critique of current rankings. In F. A. van Vught, & F. Ziegele (Eds.), Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-multirank (pp. 39-70). (Higher Education Dynamics; Vol. 37, No. 37). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3005-2_4
Federkeil, Gero ; Westerheijden, Donald F. / An evaluation and critique of current rankings. Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-multirank. editor / Franciscus A. van Vught ; Frank Ziegele. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York : Springer, 2012. pp. 39-70 (Higher Education Dynamics; 37).
@inbook{eee858c5805c425895e26dab6340727a,
title = "An evaluation and critique of current rankings",
abstract = "This chapter raises the question of whether university league tables deliver relevant information to one of their key target groups – students. It examines the inherent biases and weaknesses in the methodologies of the major rankings and argues that the concentration on a single indicator of excellence (research) and single function of an institution ignores the diverse needs and motivations of prospective students in choosing a university. It also raises the issue of rankings that proclaim the ‘excellence’ of an entire institution, which may not be an accurate reflection of the performance of individual departments. The authors then present some principles and examples of good practice in ranking and discuss alternative classification systems",
keywords = "METIS-286717, IR-84399",
author = "Gero Federkeil and Westerheijden, {Donald F.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-3005-2_4",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-94-007-3004-5",
series = "Higher Education Dynamics",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "37",
pages = "39--70",
editor = "{van Vught}, {Franciscus A.} and Frank Ziegele",
booktitle = "Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-multirank",

}

Federkeil, G & Westerheijden, DF 2012, An evaluation and critique of current rankings. in FA van Vught & F Ziegele (eds), Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-multirank. Higher Education Dynamics, no. 37, vol. 37, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, pp. 39-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3005-2_4

An evaluation and critique of current rankings. / Federkeil, Gero; Westerheijden, Donald F.

Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-multirank. ed. / Franciscus A. van Vught; Frank Ziegele. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York : Springer, 2012. p. 39-70 (Higher Education Dynamics; Vol. 37, No. 37).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - An evaluation and critique of current rankings

AU - Federkeil, Gero

AU - Westerheijden, Donald F.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This chapter raises the question of whether university league tables deliver relevant information to one of their key target groups – students. It examines the inherent biases and weaknesses in the methodologies of the major rankings and argues that the concentration on a single indicator of excellence (research) and single function of an institution ignores the diverse needs and motivations of prospective students in choosing a university. It also raises the issue of rankings that proclaim the ‘excellence’ of an entire institution, which may not be an accurate reflection of the performance of individual departments. The authors then present some principles and examples of good practice in ranking and discuss alternative classification systems

AB - This chapter raises the question of whether university league tables deliver relevant information to one of their key target groups – students. It examines the inherent biases and weaknesses in the methodologies of the major rankings and argues that the concentration on a single indicator of excellence (research) and single function of an institution ignores the diverse needs and motivations of prospective students in choosing a university. It also raises the issue of rankings that proclaim the ‘excellence’ of an entire institution, which may not be an accurate reflection of the performance of individual departments. The authors then present some principles and examples of good practice in ranking and discuss alternative classification systems

KW - METIS-286717

KW - IR-84399

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-3005-2_4

DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-3005-2_4

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-94-007-3004-5

T3 - Higher Education Dynamics

SP - 39

EP - 70

BT - Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-multirank

A2 - van Vught, Franciscus A.

A2 - Ziegele, Frank

PB - Springer

CY - Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York

ER -

Federkeil G, Westerheijden DF. An evaluation and critique of current rankings. In van Vught FA, Ziegele F, editors, Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-multirank. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer. 2012. p. 39-70. (Higher Education Dynamics; 37). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3005-2_4