An evaluation of the Quality of 360-degree Assessment Instruments

Froukje Jellema; Adrie Visscher; Martin Mulder

An evaluation of the Quality of 360-degree Assessment Instruments

Froukje Jellema, Adrie Visscher, Martin Mulder

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

131 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recently 360-degree assessment has become popular. It can be used as well for evaluating employee performance as for the evaluation of training transfer. The instruments used for this kind of assessment, where managers are evaluated by co-workers such as their supervisor, peers, subordinates and clients, should meet certain standards (e.g. psychometric and personnel evaluation standards). A checklist of standards will be presented on the basis of which 360-degree instruments are examined. In this study four 360-degree assessment instruments are examined. The outcomes of the study give insight into the qualities of a number of 360-degree instruments.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings 2000 AHRD Conference
Subtitle of host publication	Raleigh-Durham, NC, March 8-12, 2000
Editors	K. Peter Kuchinke
Place of Publication	Baton Rouge
Publisher	Academy of Human Resource Development
Pages	723-730
Number of pages	8
Publication status	Published - 17 Feb 2000
Event	Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference 2000 - Raleigh-Durham, United States Duration: 8 Mar 2000 → 12 Mar 2000

Conference

Conference	Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference 2000
Abbreviated title	AHRD
Country/Territory	United States
City	Raleigh-Durham
Period	8/03/00 → 12/03/00

Keywords

METIS-137420
360-Degree Assessment
Multirater Assessment
Training EvaluationIntroduction

Access to Document

Jellema2000evaluationFinal published version, 143 KB

Cite this

@inproceedings{feba7778f0554886b64eabaaf5704dc5,

title = "An evaluation of the Quality of 360-degree Assessment Instruments",

abstract = "Recently 360-degree assessment has become popular. It can be used as well for evaluating employee performance as for the evaluation of training transfer. The instruments used for this kind of assessment, where managers are evaluated by co-workers such as their supervisor, peers, subordinates and clients, should meet certain standards (e.g. psychometric and personnel evaluation standards). A checklist of standards will be presented on the basis of which 360-degree instruments are examined. In this study four 360-degree assessment instruments are examined. The outcomes of the study give insight into the qualities of a number of 360-degree instruments.",

keywords = "METIS-137420, 360-Degree Assessment, Multirater Assessment, Training EvaluationIntroduction",

author = "Froukje Jellema and Adrie Visscher and Martin Mulder",

year = "2000",

month = feb,

day = "17",

language = "English",

pages = "723--730",

editor = "Kuchinke, {K. Peter}",

booktitle = "Proceedings 2000 AHRD Conference",

publisher = "Academy of Human Resource Development",

address = "United States",

note = "Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference 2000, AHRD ; Conference date: 08-03-2000 Through 12-03-2000",

}

Jellema, F, Visscher, A & Mulder, M 2000, An evaluation of the Quality of 360-degree Assessment Instruments. in KP Kuchinke (ed.), Proceedings 2000 AHRD Conference: Raleigh-Durham, NC, March 8-12, 2000. Academy of Human Resource Development, Baton Rouge, pp. 723-730, Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference 2000, Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina, United States, 8/03/00.

An evaluation of the Quality of 360-degree Assessment Instruments. / Jellema, Froukje; Visscher, Adrie; Mulder, Martin.
Proceedings 2000 AHRD Conference: Raleigh-Durham, NC, March 8-12, 2000. ed. / K. Peter Kuchinke. Baton Rouge: Academy of Human Resource Development, 2000. p. 723-730.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - An evaluation of the Quality of 360-degree Assessment Instruments

AU - Jellema, Froukje

AU - Visscher, Adrie

AU - Mulder, Martin

PY - 2000/2/17

Y1 - 2000/2/17

N2 - Recently 360-degree assessment has become popular. It can be used as well for evaluating employee performance as for the evaluation of training transfer. The instruments used for this kind of assessment, where managers are evaluated by co-workers such as their supervisor, peers, subordinates and clients, should meet certain standards (e.g. psychometric and personnel evaluation standards). A checklist of standards will be presented on the basis of which 360-degree instruments are examined. In this study four 360-degree assessment instruments are examined. The outcomes of the study give insight into the qualities of a number of 360-degree instruments.

AB - Recently 360-degree assessment has become popular. It can be used as well for evaluating employee performance as for the evaluation of training transfer. The instruments used for this kind of assessment, where managers are evaluated by co-workers such as their supervisor, peers, subordinates and clients, should meet certain standards (e.g. psychometric and personnel evaluation standards). A checklist of standards will be presented on the basis of which 360-degree instruments are examined. In this study four 360-degree assessment instruments are examined. The outcomes of the study give insight into the qualities of a number of 360-degree instruments.

KW - METIS-137420

KW - 360-Degree Assessment

KW - Multirater Assessment

KW - Training EvaluationIntroduction

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 723

EP - 730

BT - Proceedings 2000 AHRD Conference

A2 - Kuchinke, K. Peter

PB - Academy of Human Resource Development

CY - Baton Rouge

T2 - Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference 2000

Y2 - 8 March 2000 through 12 March 2000

ER -

An evaluation of the Quality of 360-degree Assessment Instruments

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this