An experimental approach to regulating non-military unmanned aircraft systems

Haomiao Du (Corresponding Author), Michiel A. Heldeweg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
199 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article introduces three modes of regulatory experimentation – derogation, devolution and open-texture – for regulators to respond to the challenges brought by disruptive innovation such as non-military unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This article argues that where there is an urgency of requiring a regulatory response to a new societal challenge, and there is serious empirical uncertainty about expected technological or regulatory events and/or their consequences, experimental regulations can be a fitting approach in dealing with the new challenge – as with UAS. As the risk of failure is an intrinsic aspect of innovation, the most significant function of regulatory experimentation is to yield useful information rather than verify the validity of an innovation. Nevertheless, the setting of experimental regulation should take into account both epistemic requirements and legal values. The principles of certainty, equality and proportionality express the legal values that guide decision-making towards legitimate experimental regulation. The experimental approach demonstrated in this article also provides a model of ‘future-proof’ regulation. This is applied to UAS particularly by zones as experimenting by derogation and perhaps also by devolution and open texture.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Review of Law, Computers and Technology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print/First online - 6 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

aircraft
Innovation
Aircraft
regulation
Textures
innovation
decentralization
proportionality
Decision making
Values
equality
uncertainty
decision making
event
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Experimental regulation
  • unmanned aircraft systems
  • disruptive innovation

Cite this

@article{6b00a56cf0914f12bbd6267ea0590d18,
title = "An experimental approach to regulating non-military unmanned aircraft systems",
abstract = "This article introduces three modes of regulatory experimentation – derogation, devolution and open-texture – for regulators to respond to the challenges brought by disruptive innovation such as non-military unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This article argues that where there is an urgency of requiring a regulatory response to a new societal challenge, and there is serious empirical uncertainty about expected technological or regulatory events and/or their consequences, experimental regulations can be a fitting approach in dealing with the new challenge – as with UAS. As the risk of failure is an intrinsic aspect of innovation, the most significant function of regulatory experimentation is to yield useful information rather than verify the validity of an innovation. Nevertheless, the setting of experimental regulation should take into account both epistemic requirements and legal values. The principles of certainty, equality and proportionality express the legal values that guide decision-making towards legitimate experimental regulation. The experimental approach demonstrated in this article also provides a model of ‘future-proof’ regulation. This is applied to UAS particularly by zones as experimenting by derogation and perhaps also by devolution and open texture.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, Experimental regulation, unmanned aircraft systems, disruptive innovation",
author = "Haomiao Du and Heldeweg, {Michiel A.}",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1080/13600869.2018.1429721",
language = "English",
journal = "International Review of Law, Computers and Technology",
issn = "1360-0869",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

An experimental approach to regulating non-military unmanned aircraft systems. / Du, Haomiao (Corresponding Author); Heldeweg, Michiel A.

In: International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 06.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An experimental approach to regulating non-military unmanned aircraft systems

AU - Du, Haomiao

AU - Heldeweg, Michiel A.

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2018/2/6

Y1 - 2018/2/6

N2 - This article introduces three modes of regulatory experimentation – derogation, devolution and open-texture – for regulators to respond to the challenges brought by disruptive innovation such as non-military unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This article argues that where there is an urgency of requiring a regulatory response to a new societal challenge, and there is serious empirical uncertainty about expected technological or regulatory events and/or their consequences, experimental regulations can be a fitting approach in dealing with the new challenge – as with UAS. As the risk of failure is an intrinsic aspect of innovation, the most significant function of regulatory experimentation is to yield useful information rather than verify the validity of an innovation. Nevertheless, the setting of experimental regulation should take into account both epistemic requirements and legal values. The principles of certainty, equality and proportionality express the legal values that guide decision-making towards legitimate experimental regulation. The experimental approach demonstrated in this article also provides a model of ‘future-proof’ regulation. This is applied to UAS particularly by zones as experimenting by derogation and perhaps also by devolution and open texture.

AB - This article introduces three modes of regulatory experimentation – derogation, devolution and open-texture – for regulators to respond to the challenges brought by disruptive innovation such as non-military unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This article argues that where there is an urgency of requiring a regulatory response to a new societal challenge, and there is serious empirical uncertainty about expected technological or regulatory events and/or their consequences, experimental regulations can be a fitting approach in dealing with the new challenge – as with UAS. As the risk of failure is an intrinsic aspect of innovation, the most significant function of regulatory experimentation is to yield useful information rather than verify the validity of an innovation. Nevertheless, the setting of experimental regulation should take into account both epistemic requirements and legal values. The principles of certainty, equality and proportionality express the legal values that guide decision-making towards legitimate experimental regulation. The experimental approach demonstrated in this article also provides a model of ‘future-proof’ regulation. This is applied to UAS particularly by zones as experimenting by derogation and perhaps also by devolution and open texture.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - Experimental regulation

KW - unmanned aircraft systems

KW - disruptive innovation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041520670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13600869.2018.1429721

DO - 10.1080/13600869.2018.1429721

M3 - Article

JO - International Review of Law, Computers and Technology

JF - International Review of Law, Computers and Technology

SN - 1360-0869

ER -