An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function

Loek A. Van Der Heide, Bob Van Ninhuijs, Arjen Bergsma, Gert Jan Gelderblom, Dick J. Van Der Pijl, Luc P. De Witte

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Assistive devices that augment arm function were already introduced during the polio era. Devices are still being developed, but a review has not been performed thus far. Objective: To create an overview and categorize assistive devices facilitating arm function in activities of daily living for people with decreased arm function. Study design: Literature review. Methods: A systematic review in three scientific literature databases. Conference proceedings, assistive technology databases, and references were searched and experts consulted. This resulted in a database of dynamic arm supports. Product information was added, and the devices were categorized. Results: A total of 104 dynamic arm supports were found. These could be categorized as nonactuated devices (N = 39), passively actuated devices (N = 24), actively actuated devices (N = 34), or devices using the functional electrical stimulation principle (N = 7). Functionality analysis resulted in second-level categorization: tremor suppression, facilitation of anti-gravity movement, and assistance of specific joint motion. Conclusion: All devices could be ordered in a categorization of low complexity. Many have been developed; most have disappeared and have been succeeded by similar devices. Limitations of the devices found mainly concern interfacing and the range of motion facilitated. Future devices could make use of whatever residual strength is available in the users' arm for control.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)287-302
    Number of pages16
    JournalProsthetics and orthotics international
    Volume38
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

    Fingerprint

    Equipment and Supplies
    Self-Help Devices
    Databases
    Literature
    Gravitation
    Poliomyelitis
    Tremor
    Activities of Daily Living
    Articular Range of Motion
    Electric Stimulation
    Joints

    Keywords

    • Dynamic arm support
    • Orthotic devices
    • Self-help devices

    Cite this

    Van Der Heide, L. A., Van Ninhuijs, B., Bergsma, A., Gelderblom, G. J., Van Der Pijl, D. J., & De Witte, L. P. (2014). An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function. Prosthetics and orthotics international, 38(4), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364613498538
    Van Der Heide, Loek A. ; Van Ninhuijs, Bob ; Bergsma, Arjen ; Gelderblom, Gert Jan ; Van Der Pijl, Dick J. ; De Witte, Luc P. / An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function. In: Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2014 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 287-302.
    @article{5aea48e33fb44850bb50b137c621cbc3,
    title = "An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function",
    abstract = "Background: Assistive devices that augment arm function were already introduced during the polio era. Devices are still being developed, but a review has not been performed thus far. Objective: To create an overview and categorize assistive devices facilitating arm function in activities of daily living for people with decreased arm function. Study design: Literature review. Methods: A systematic review in three scientific literature databases. Conference proceedings, assistive technology databases, and references were searched and experts consulted. This resulted in a database of dynamic arm supports. Product information was added, and the devices were categorized. Results: A total of 104 dynamic arm supports were found. These could be categorized as nonactuated devices (N = 39), passively actuated devices (N = 24), actively actuated devices (N = 34), or devices using the functional electrical stimulation principle (N = 7). Functionality analysis resulted in second-level categorization: tremor suppression, facilitation of anti-gravity movement, and assistance of specific joint motion. Conclusion: All devices could be ordered in a categorization of low complexity. Many have been developed; most have disappeared and have been succeeded by similar devices. Limitations of the devices found mainly concern interfacing and the range of motion facilitated. Future devices could make use of whatever residual strength is available in the users' arm for control.",
    keywords = "Dynamic arm support, Orthotic devices, Self-help devices",
    author = "{Van Der Heide}, {Loek A.} and {Van Ninhuijs}, Bob and Arjen Bergsma and Gelderblom, {Gert Jan} and {Van Der Pijl}, {Dick J.} and {De Witte}, {Luc P.}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0309364613498538",
    language = "English",
    volume = "38",
    pages = "287--302",
    journal = "Prosthetics and orthotics international",
    issn = "0309-3646",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "4",

    }

    Van Der Heide, LA, Van Ninhuijs, B, Bergsma, A, Gelderblom, GJ, Van Der Pijl, DJ & De Witte, LP 2014, 'An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function' Prosthetics and orthotics international, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364613498538

    An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function. / Van Der Heide, Loek A.; Van Ninhuijs, Bob; Bergsma, Arjen; Gelderblom, Gert Jan; Van Der Pijl, Dick J.; De Witte, Luc P.

    In: Prosthetics and orthotics international, Vol. 38, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 287-302.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function

    AU - Van Der Heide, Loek A.

    AU - Van Ninhuijs, Bob

    AU - Bergsma, Arjen

    AU - Gelderblom, Gert Jan

    AU - Van Der Pijl, Dick J.

    AU - De Witte, Luc P.

    PY - 2014/1/1

    Y1 - 2014/1/1

    N2 - Background: Assistive devices that augment arm function were already introduced during the polio era. Devices are still being developed, but a review has not been performed thus far. Objective: To create an overview and categorize assistive devices facilitating arm function in activities of daily living for people with decreased arm function. Study design: Literature review. Methods: A systematic review in three scientific literature databases. Conference proceedings, assistive technology databases, and references were searched and experts consulted. This resulted in a database of dynamic arm supports. Product information was added, and the devices were categorized. Results: A total of 104 dynamic arm supports were found. These could be categorized as nonactuated devices (N = 39), passively actuated devices (N = 24), actively actuated devices (N = 34), or devices using the functional electrical stimulation principle (N = 7). Functionality analysis resulted in second-level categorization: tremor suppression, facilitation of anti-gravity movement, and assistance of specific joint motion. Conclusion: All devices could be ordered in a categorization of low complexity. Many have been developed; most have disappeared and have been succeeded by similar devices. Limitations of the devices found mainly concern interfacing and the range of motion facilitated. Future devices could make use of whatever residual strength is available in the users' arm for control.

    AB - Background: Assistive devices that augment arm function were already introduced during the polio era. Devices are still being developed, but a review has not been performed thus far. Objective: To create an overview and categorize assistive devices facilitating arm function in activities of daily living for people with decreased arm function. Study design: Literature review. Methods: A systematic review in three scientific literature databases. Conference proceedings, assistive technology databases, and references were searched and experts consulted. This resulted in a database of dynamic arm supports. Product information was added, and the devices were categorized. Results: A total of 104 dynamic arm supports were found. These could be categorized as nonactuated devices (N = 39), passively actuated devices (N = 24), actively actuated devices (N = 34), or devices using the functional electrical stimulation principle (N = 7). Functionality analysis resulted in second-level categorization: tremor suppression, facilitation of anti-gravity movement, and assistance of specific joint motion. Conclusion: All devices could be ordered in a categorization of low complexity. Many have been developed; most have disappeared and have been succeeded by similar devices. Limitations of the devices found mainly concern interfacing and the range of motion facilitated. Future devices could make use of whatever residual strength is available in the users' arm for control.

    KW - Dynamic arm support

    KW - Orthotic devices

    KW - Self-help devices

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906903373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0309364613498538

    DO - 10.1177/0309364613498538

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 38

    SP - 287

    EP - 302

    JO - Prosthetics and orthotics international

    JF - Prosthetics and orthotics international

    SN - 0309-3646

    IS - 4

    ER -