Abstract
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2005 IEEEE International Professional Communication Conference Proceedings |
| Place of Publication | Limerick, Ireland |
| Publisher | IEEE |
| Pages | 323-327 |
| ISBN (Print) | 0-7803-9027-X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Jul 2005 |
| Event | IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, IPCC 2005 - Limerick, Ireland Duration: 10 Jul 2005 → 13 Jul 2005 |
Publication series
| Name | |
|---|---|
| Publisher | IEEE |
Conference
| Conference | IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, IPCC 2005 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | IPCC |
| Country | Ireland |
| City | Limerick |
| Period | 10/07/05 → 13/07/05 |
Keywords
- IR-55179
- METIS-230374
Cite this
}
Analyzing the interaction between facilitator and participants in two variants of the think-aloud method. / van den Haak, M.J.; de Jong, Menno D.T.
2005 IEEEE International Professional Communication Conference Proceedings. Limerick, Ireland : IEEE, 2005. p. 323-327.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic
TY - GEN
T1 - Analyzing the interaction between facilitator and participants in two variants of the think-aloud method.
AU - van den Haak, M.J.
AU - de Jong, Menno D.T.
PY - 2005/7/10
Y1 - 2005/7/10
N2 - This paper focuses on the interaction between test participants and test facilitator in two variants of the think-aloud method. In a first, explorative study, we analyzed think-aloud transcripts from two usability tests: a concurrent think-aloud test and a constructive interaction test. The results of our analysis show that while the participants in both studies never explicitly addressed the facilitator, the think-aloud participants showed more signs of awareness of the facilitator than the participants in the constructive interaction test. This finding may have practical implications for the validity of the two methods.
AB - This paper focuses on the interaction between test participants and test facilitator in two variants of the think-aloud method. In a first, explorative study, we analyzed think-aloud transcripts from two usability tests: a concurrent think-aloud test and a constructive interaction test. The results of our analysis show that while the participants in both studies never explicitly addressed the facilitator, the think-aloud participants showed more signs of awareness of the facilitator than the participants in the constructive interaction test. This finding may have practical implications for the validity of the two methods.
KW - IR-55179
KW - METIS-230374
U2 - 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494192
DO - 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494192
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 0-7803-9027-X
SP - 323
EP - 327
BT - 2005 IEEEE International Professional Communication Conference Proceedings
PB - IEEE
CY - Limerick, Ireland
ER -