Applying Pattern Oriented Sampling in current fieldwork practice to enable more effective model evaluation in fluvial landscape evolution research

Rebecca M. Briant (Corresponding Author), Kim M. Cohen, Stephane Cordier, Alain J.a.g. Demoulin, Mark G. Macklin, Anne E. Mather, Gilles Rixhon, A. Veldkamp, John Wainwright, Alex Whittaker, Hella Wittmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Field geologists and geomorphologists are increasingly looking to numerical modelling to understand landscape change over time, particularly in river catchments. The application of landscape evolution models (LEMs) started with abstract research questions in synthetic landscapes. Now, however, studies using LEMs on real‐world catchments are becoming increasingly common. This development has philosophical implications for model specification and evaluation using geological and geomorphological data, besides practical implications for fieldwork targets and strategy. The type of data produced to drive and constrain LEM simulations has very little in common with that used to calibrate and validate models operating over shorter timescales, making a new approach necessary. Here we argue that catchment fieldwork and LEM studies are best synchronized by complementing the Pattern Oriented Modelling (POM) approach of most fluvial LEMs with Pattern Oriented Sampling (POS) fieldwork approaches. POS can embrace a wide range of field data types, without overly increasing the burden of data collection. In our approach, both POM output and POS field data for a specific catchment are used to quantify key characteristics of a catchment. These are then compared to provide an evaluation of the performance of the model. Early identification of these key characteristics should be undertaken to drive focused POS data collection and POM model specification. Once models are evaluated using this POM/POS approach, conclusions drawn from LEM studies can be used with greater confidence to improve understanding of landscape change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2964-2980
Number of pages17
JournalEarth surface processes and landforms
Volume43
Issue number14
Early online date26 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

landscape evolution
fieldwork
sampling
evaluation
catchment
modeling
landscape change
operating model
simulation model
confidence
river
timescale

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
  • landscape evolution modelling
  • geological field data
  • catchments
  • fluvial systems
  • Pattern Oriented Sampling
  • UT-Hybrid-D

Cite this

Briant, R. M., Cohen, K. M., Cordier, S., Demoulin, A. J. A. G., Macklin, M. G., Mather, A. E., ... Wittmann, H. (2018). Applying Pattern Oriented Sampling in current fieldwork practice to enable more effective model evaluation in fluvial landscape evolution research. Earth surface processes and landforms, 43(14), 2964-2980. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4458
Briant, Rebecca M. ; Cohen, Kim M. ; Cordier, Stephane ; Demoulin, Alain J.a.g. ; Macklin, Mark G. ; Mather, Anne E. ; Rixhon, Gilles ; Veldkamp, A. ; Wainwright, John ; Whittaker, Alex ; Wittmann, Hella. / Applying Pattern Oriented Sampling in current fieldwork practice to enable more effective model evaluation in fluvial landscape evolution research. In: Earth surface processes and landforms. 2018 ; Vol. 43, No. 14. pp. 2964-2980.
@article{4a1a73dddd8b41af854d1cd157791634,
title = "Applying Pattern Oriented Sampling in current fieldwork practice to enable more effective model evaluation in fluvial landscape evolution research",
abstract = "Field geologists and geomorphologists are increasingly looking to numerical modelling to understand landscape change over time, particularly in river catchments. The application of landscape evolution models (LEMs) started with abstract research questions in synthetic landscapes. Now, however, studies using LEMs on real‐world catchments are becoming increasingly common. This development has philosophical implications for model specification and evaluation using geological and geomorphological data, besides practical implications for fieldwork targets and strategy. The type of data produced to drive and constrain LEM simulations has very little in common with that used to calibrate and validate models operating over shorter timescales, making a new approach necessary. Here we argue that catchment fieldwork and LEM studies are best synchronized by complementing the Pattern Oriented Modelling (POM) approach of most fluvial LEMs with Pattern Oriented Sampling (POS) fieldwork approaches. POS can embrace a wide range of field data types, without overly increasing the burden of data collection. In our approach, both POM output and POS field data for a specific catchment are used to quantify key characteristics of a catchment. These are then compared to provide an evaluation of the performance of the model. Early identification of these key characteristics should be undertaken to drive focused POS data collection and POM model specification. Once models are evaluated using this POM/POS approach, conclusions drawn from LEM studies can be used with greater confidence to improve understanding of landscape change.",
keywords = "ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE, landscape evolution modelling, geological field data, catchments, fluvial systems, Pattern Oriented Sampling, UT-Hybrid-D",
author = "Briant, {Rebecca M.} and Cohen, {Kim M.} and Stephane Cordier and Demoulin, {Alain J.a.g.} and Macklin, {Mark G.} and Mather, {Anne E.} and Gilles Rixhon and A. Veldkamp and John Wainwright and Alex Whittaker and Hella Wittmann",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/esp.4458",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "2964--2980",
journal = "Earth surface processes and landforms",
issn = "0197-9337",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "14",

}

Briant, RM, Cohen, KM, Cordier, S, Demoulin, AJAG, Macklin, MG, Mather, AE, Rixhon, G, Veldkamp, A, Wainwright, J, Whittaker, A & Wittmann, H 2018, 'Applying Pattern Oriented Sampling in current fieldwork practice to enable more effective model evaluation in fluvial landscape evolution research' Earth surface processes and landforms, vol. 43, no. 14, pp. 2964-2980. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4458

Applying Pattern Oriented Sampling in current fieldwork practice to enable more effective model evaluation in fluvial landscape evolution research. / Briant, Rebecca M. (Corresponding Author); Cohen, Kim M.; Cordier, Stephane; Demoulin, Alain J.a.g.; Macklin, Mark G.; Mather, Anne E.; Rixhon, Gilles; Veldkamp, A.; Wainwright, John; Whittaker, Alex; Wittmann, Hella.

In: Earth surface processes and landforms, Vol. 43, No. 14, 01.11.2018, p. 2964-2980.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying Pattern Oriented Sampling in current fieldwork practice to enable more effective model evaluation in fluvial landscape evolution research

AU - Briant, Rebecca M.

AU - Cohen, Kim M.

AU - Cordier, Stephane

AU - Demoulin, Alain J.a.g.

AU - Macklin, Mark G.

AU - Mather, Anne E.

AU - Rixhon, Gilles

AU - Veldkamp, A.

AU - Wainwright, John

AU - Whittaker, Alex

AU - Wittmann, Hella

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Field geologists and geomorphologists are increasingly looking to numerical modelling to understand landscape change over time, particularly in river catchments. The application of landscape evolution models (LEMs) started with abstract research questions in synthetic landscapes. Now, however, studies using LEMs on real‐world catchments are becoming increasingly common. This development has philosophical implications for model specification and evaluation using geological and geomorphological data, besides practical implications for fieldwork targets and strategy. The type of data produced to drive and constrain LEM simulations has very little in common with that used to calibrate and validate models operating over shorter timescales, making a new approach necessary. Here we argue that catchment fieldwork and LEM studies are best synchronized by complementing the Pattern Oriented Modelling (POM) approach of most fluvial LEMs with Pattern Oriented Sampling (POS) fieldwork approaches. POS can embrace a wide range of field data types, without overly increasing the burden of data collection. In our approach, both POM output and POS field data for a specific catchment are used to quantify key characteristics of a catchment. These are then compared to provide an evaluation of the performance of the model. Early identification of these key characteristics should be undertaken to drive focused POS data collection and POM model specification. Once models are evaluated using this POM/POS approach, conclusions drawn from LEM studies can be used with greater confidence to improve understanding of landscape change.

AB - Field geologists and geomorphologists are increasingly looking to numerical modelling to understand landscape change over time, particularly in river catchments. The application of landscape evolution models (LEMs) started with abstract research questions in synthetic landscapes. Now, however, studies using LEMs on real‐world catchments are becoming increasingly common. This development has philosophical implications for model specification and evaluation using geological and geomorphological data, besides practical implications for fieldwork targets and strategy. The type of data produced to drive and constrain LEM simulations has very little in common with that used to calibrate and validate models operating over shorter timescales, making a new approach necessary. Here we argue that catchment fieldwork and LEM studies are best synchronized by complementing the Pattern Oriented Modelling (POM) approach of most fluvial LEMs with Pattern Oriented Sampling (POS) fieldwork approaches. POS can embrace a wide range of field data types, without overly increasing the burden of data collection. In our approach, both POM output and POS field data for a specific catchment are used to quantify key characteristics of a catchment. These are then compared to provide an evaluation of the performance of the model. Early identification of these key characteristics should be undertaken to drive focused POS data collection and POM model specification. Once models are evaluated using this POM/POS approach, conclusions drawn from LEM studies can be used with greater confidence to improve understanding of landscape change.

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

KW - landscape evolution modelling

KW - geological field data

KW - catchments

KW - fluvial systems

KW - Pattern Oriented Sampling

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://doi.org/http://10.1002/esp.4458

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2018/isi/veldkamp_app.pdf

U2 - 10.1002/esp.4458

DO - 10.1002/esp.4458

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 2964

EP - 2980

JO - Earth surface processes and landforms

JF - Earth surface processes and landforms

SN - 0197-9337

IS - 14

ER -