TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing vegetation traits estimates accuracies from the future SBG and biodiversity hyperspectral missions over two Mediterranean Forests
AU - Miraglio, Thomas
AU - Adeline, Karine
AU - Huesca Martinez, M.
AU - Ustin, Susan
AU - Briottet, Xavier
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Office Nationale d’Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales (ONERA) and by Région Occitanie. The authors are grateful to the John Muir Institute of the Environment team for collecting and processing the field data, and to NASA JPL from providing AVIRIS-C data (NASA grant No. NNX12AP08G). They also thank Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry from CESBIO for his insight and help concerning the DART simulations.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/5/19
Y1 - 2022/5/19
N2 - The estimation and mapping of vegetation traits from satellite hyperspectral imagery is entering a new era, as multiple missions have recently started and more are currently in preparatory phase. With expected ground sampling distances (GSD) ranging from 8 to 30 m, these missions could complement each other, especially over spatially heterogeneous environments where the canopy cover (CC) is low. This study focused on the retrieval of five vegetation traits (gap fraction, leaf chlorophylls (C ab) and carotenoids (Car) contents, equivalent water thickness, and leaf mass per area) of two Mediterranean-climate forests from AVIRIS-Classic (AVIRIS-C), synthetic Biodiversity, and synthetic Surface Biology and Geology (SBG) missions with 18 m, 8 m, and 30 m GSD, respectively, using a hybrid method. The synthetic SBG images were provided by NASA, while the Biodiversity images were generated from airborne AVIRIS-Next Generation hyperspectral imagery. Partial least-square regressors were trained over the outputs of the DART model to estimates vegetation traits. Estimated accuracies were assessed, when possible, by comparison with in situ measurements. We showed that estimated accuracy of gap fraction was similar between AVIRIS-C and SBG (RMSE of 0.09, R 2 of 0.8 and RMSE of 0.07, R 2 of 0.59, respectively). Leaf traits estimated accuracies were also similar between these two sensors, but only acceptable for C ab and Car (∼ 7.5 μg.cm −2 RMSE for C ab, ∼ 1.65 μg.cm −2 RMSE for Car), especially over the densest parts of the canopy. When comparing estimates obtained from Biodiversity and SBG imagery, it appeared that the denser the canopy, the more estimates from both sensors were in agreement for all leaf traits (for instance, C ab, R 2 was 0.2 for 30% ≤ CC ≤ 50% and 0.48 for CC ≥ 80%). The results show that (i) SBG imagery should lead to estimated accuracies similar to AVIRIS-C, with acceptable performances over dense canopies, and that (ii) Biodiversity imagery has a high potential to map vegetation traits over any canopy no matter its sparsity, as individual tree crowns are mostly resolved at an 8 m GSD.
AB - The estimation and mapping of vegetation traits from satellite hyperspectral imagery is entering a new era, as multiple missions have recently started and more are currently in preparatory phase. With expected ground sampling distances (GSD) ranging from 8 to 30 m, these missions could complement each other, especially over spatially heterogeneous environments where the canopy cover (CC) is low. This study focused on the retrieval of five vegetation traits (gap fraction, leaf chlorophylls (C ab) and carotenoids (Car) contents, equivalent water thickness, and leaf mass per area) of two Mediterranean-climate forests from AVIRIS-Classic (AVIRIS-C), synthetic Biodiversity, and synthetic Surface Biology and Geology (SBG) missions with 18 m, 8 m, and 30 m GSD, respectively, using a hybrid method. The synthetic SBG images were provided by NASA, while the Biodiversity images were generated from airborne AVIRIS-Next Generation hyperspectral imagery. Partial least-square regressors were trained over the outputs of the DART model to estimates vegetation traits. Estimated accuracies were assessed, when possible, by comparison with in situ measurements. We showed that estimated accuracy of gap fraction was similar between AVIRIS-C and SBG (RMSE of 0.09, R 2 of 0.8 and RMSE of 0.07, R 2 of 0.59, respectively). Leaf traits estimated accuracies were also similar between these two sensors, but only acceptable for C ab and Car (∼ 7.5 μg.cm −2 RMSE for C ab, ∼ 1.65 μg.cm −2 RMSE for Car), especially over the densest parts of the canopy. When comparing estimates obtained from Biodiversity and SBG imagery, it appeared that the denser the canopy, the more estimates from both sensors were in agreement for all leaf traits (for instance, C ab, R 2 was 0.2 for 30% ≤ CC ≤ 50% and 0.48 for CC ≥ 80%). The results show that (i) SBG imagery should lead to estimated accuracies similar to AVIRIS-C, with acceptable performances over dense canopies, and that (ii) Biodiversity imagery has a high potential to map vegetation traits over any canopy no matter its sparsity, as individual tree crowns are mostly resolved at an 8 m GSD.
KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
KW - ITC-HYBRID
KW - DART
KW - hybrid method
KW - Imaging spectroscopy
KW - vegetation traits
KW - PLSR
U2 - 10.1080/01431161.2022.2093143
DO - 10.1080/01431161.2022.2093143
M3 - Article
SN - 0143-1161
VL - 43
SP - 3537
EP - 3562
JO - International journal of remote sensing
JF - International journal of remote sensing
IS - 10
ER -