Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations

Kirsten Berthold, Tessa H.S. Eysink, Alexander Renkl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Learning with multiple representations is usually employed in order to foster understanding. However, it also imposes high demands on the learners and often does not lead to the expected results, especially because the learners do not integrate the different representations. Thus, it is necessary to support the learners’ self-explanation activity, which concerns the integration and understanding of multiple representations. In the present experiment, we employed multi-representational worked-out examples and tested the effects of two types of self-explanation prompts as help procedures for integrating and understanding multiple representations. The participants (N = 62) learned about probability theory under three conditions: (a) open self-explanation prompts, (b) self-explanation prompts in an assistance-giving-assistance-withholding procedure (assisting self-explanation prompts), or (c) no prompts (control group). Both types of self-explanation prompts fostered procedural knowledge. This effect was mediated by self-explanations directed to domain principles. Conceptual knowledge was particularly fostered by assisting self-explanation prompts which was mediated by self-explanations on the rationale of a principle. Thus, for enhancing high-quality self-explanations and both procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding, we conclude that assisting self-explanation prompts should be provided. We call this the assisting self-explanation prompt effect which refers to the elicitation of high-quality self-explanations and the acquisition of deep understanding.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)345-363
JournalInstructional science
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

Keywords

  • Open self-explanation prompts - Assisting self-explanation prompts - Self-explanations - Multiple representations - Mathematics learning

Cite this

@article{c0e50d11f96740a6a287a208d4afd23f,
title = "Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations",
abstract = "Learning with multiple representations is usually employed in order to foster understanding. However, it also imposes high demands on the learners and often does not lead to the expected results, especially because the learners do not integrate the different representations. Thus, it is necessary to support the learners’ self-explanation activity, which concerns the integration and understanding of multiple representations. In the present experiment, we employed multi-representational worked-out examples and tested the effects of two types of self-explanation prompts as help procedures for integrating and understanding multiple representations. The participants (N = 62) learned about probability theory under three conditions: (a) open self-explanation prompts, (b) self-explanation prompts in an assistance-giving-assistance-withholding procedure (assisting self-explanation prompts), or (c) no prompts (control group). Both types of self-explanation prompts fostered procedural knowledge. This effect was mediated by self-explanations directed to domain principles. Conceptual knowledge was particularly fostered by assisting self-explanation prompts which was mediated by self-explanations on the rationale of a principle. Thus, for enhancing high-quality self-explanations and both procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding, we conclude that assisting self-explanation prompts should be provided. We call this the assisting self-explanation prompt effect which refers to the elicitation of high-quality self-explanations and the acquisition of deep understanding.",
keywords = "Open self-explanation prompts - Assisting self-explanation prompts - Self-explanations - Multiple representations - Mathematics learning",
author = "Kirsten Berthold and Eysink, {Tessa H.S.} and Alexander Renkl",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11251-008-9051-z",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "37",
pages = "345--363",
journal = "Instructional science",
issn = "0020-4277",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. / Berthold, Kirsten; Eysink, Tessa H.S.; Renkl, Alexander.

In: Instructional science, Vol. 37, No. 4, 07.2009, p. 345-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations

AU - Berthold, Kirsten

AU - Eysink, Tessa H.S.

AU - Renkl, Alexander

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Learning with multiple representations is usually employed in order to foster understanding. However, it also imposes high demands on the learners and often does not lead to the expected results, especially because the learners do not integrate the different representations. Thus, it is necessary to support the learners’ self-explanation activity, which concerns the integration and understanding of multiple representations. In the present experiment, we employed multi-representational worked-out examples and tested the effects of two types of self-explanation prompts as help procedures for integrating and understanding multiple representations. The participants (N = 62) learned about probability theory under three conditions: (a) open self-explanation prompts, (b) self-explanation prompts in an assistance-giving-assistance-withholding procedure (assisting self-explanation prompts), or (c) no prompts (control group). Both types of self-explanation prompts fostered procedural knowledge. This effect was mediated by self-explanations directed to domain principles. Conceptual knowledge was particularly fostered by assisting self-explanation prompts which was mediated by self-explanations on the rationale of a principle. Thus, for enhancing high-quality self-explanations and both procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding, we conclude that assisting self-explanation prompts should be provided. We call this the assisting self-explanation prompt effect which refers to the elicitation of high-quality self-explanations and the acquisition of deep understanding.

AB - Learning with multiple representations is usually employed in order to foster understanding. However, it also imposes high demands on the learners and often does not lead to the expected results, especially because the learners do not integrate the different representations. Thus, it is necessary to support the learners’ self-explanation activity, which concerns the integration and understanding of multiple representations. In the present experiment, we employed multi-representational worked-out examples and tested the effects of two types of self-explanation prompts as help procedures for integrating and understanding multiple representations. The participants (N = 62) learned about probability theory under three conditions: (a) open self-explanation prompts, (b) self-explanation prompts in an assistance-giving-assistance-withholding procedure (assisting self-explanation prompts), or (c) no prompts (control group). Both types of self-explanation prompts fostered procedural knowledge. This effect was mediated by self-explanations directed to domain principles. Conceptual knowledge was particularly fostered by assisting self-explanation prompts which was mediated by self-explanations on the rationale of a principle. Thus, for enhancing high-quality self-explanations and both procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding, we conclude that assisting self-explanation prompts should be provided. We call this the assisting self-explanation prompt effect which refers to the elicitation of high-quality self-explanations and the acquisition of deep understanding.

KW - Open self-explanation prompts - Assisting self-explanation prompts - Self-explanations - Multiple representations - Mathematics learning

U2 - 10.1007/s11251-008-9051-z

DO - 10.1007/s11251-008-9051-z

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 345

EP - 363

JO - Instructional science

JF - Instructional science

SN - 0020-4277

IS - 4

ER -