Automated Feedback Can Improve Hypothesis Quality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Stating a hypothesis is one of the central processes in inquiry learning, and often forms the starting point of the inquiry process. We designed, implemented, and evaluated an automated parsing and feedback system that informed students about the quality of hypotheses they had created in an online tool, the hypothesis scratchpad. In two pilot studies in different domains (“supply and demand” from economics and “electrical circuits” from physics) we determined the parser's accuracy by comparing its judgments with those of human experts. A satisfactory to high accuracy was reached. In the main study (in the “electrical circuits” domain), students were assigned to one of two conditions: no feedback (control) and automated feedback. We found that the subset of students in the experimental condition who asked for automated feedback on their hypotheses were much more likely to create a syntactically correct hypothesis than students in either condition who did not ask for feedback.
LanguageEnglish
Article number116
Number of pages14
JournalFrontiers in Education
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

student
physics
expert
supply
demand
learning
economics

Keywords

  • Goud DOAJ

Cite this

@article{111576a2b3ab400b893cb7b5191c856e,
title = "Automated Feedback Can Improve Hypothesis Quality",
abstract = "Stating a hypothesis is one of the central processes in inquiry learning, and often forms the starting point of the inquiry process. We designed, implemented, and evaluated an automated parsing and feedback system that informed students about the quality of hypotheses they had created in an online tool, the hypothesis scratchpad. In two pilot studies in different domains (“supply and demand” from economics and “electrical circuits” from physics) we determined the parser's accuracy by comparing its judgments with those of human experts. A satisfactory to high accuracy was reached. In the main study (in the “electrical circuits” domain), students were assigned to one of two conditions: no feedback (control) and automated feedback. We found that the subset of students in the experimental condition who asked for automated feedback on their hypotheses were much more likely to create a syntactically correct hypothesis than students in either condition who did not ask for feedback.",
keywords = "Goud DOAJ",
author = "Kroeze, {Karel A.} and {Van Den Berg}, {St{\'e}phanie M.} and Lazonder, {Ard W.} and Veldkamp, {Bernard P.} and {De Jong}, Ton",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3389/feduc.2018.00116",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Frontiers in Education",
issn = "2504-284X",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

Automated Feedback Can Improve Hypothesis Quality. / Kroeze, Karel A. (Corresponding Author); Van Den Berg, Stéphanie M.; Lazonder, Ard W.; Veldkamp, Bernard P.; De Jong, Ton.

In: Frontiers in Education, Vol. 3, 116, 04.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated Feedback Can Improve Hypothesis Quality

AU - Kroeze, Karel A.

AU - Van Den Berg, Stéphanie M.

AU - Lazonder, Ard W.

AU - Veldkamp, Bernard P.

AU - De Jong, Ton

PY - 2019/1/4

Y1 - 2019/1/4

N2 - Stating a hypothesis is one of the central processes in inquiry learning, and often forms the starting point of the inquiry process. We designed, implemented, and evaluated an automated parsing and feedback system that informed students about the quality of hypotheses they had created in an online tool, the hypothesis scratchpad. In two pilot studies in different domains (“supply and demand” from economics and “electrical circuits” from physics) we determined the parser's accuracy by comparing its judgments with those of human experts. A satisfactory to high accuracy was reached. In the main study (in the “electrical circuits” domain), students were assigned to one of two conditions: no feedback (control) and automated feedback. We found that the subset of students in the experimental condition who asked for automated feedback on their hypotheses were much more likely to create a syntactically correct hypothesis than students in either condition who did not ask for feedback.

AB - Stating a hypothesis is one of the central processes in inquiry learning, and often forms the starting point of the inquiry process. We designed, implemented, and evaluated an automated parsing and feedback system that informed students about the quality of hypotheses they had created in an online tool, the hypothesis scratchpad. In two pilot studies in different domains (“supply and demand” from economics and “electrical circuits” from physics) we determined the parser's accuracy by comparing its judgments with those of human experts. A satisfactory to high accuracy was reached. In the main study (in the “electrical circuits” domain), students were assigned to one of two conditions: no feedback (control) and automated feedback. We found that the subset of students in the experimental condition who asked for automated feedback on their hypotheses were much more likely to create a syntactically correct hypothesis than students in either condition who did not ask for feedback.

KW - Goud DOAJ

U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2018.00116

DO - 10.3389/feduc.2018.00116

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Frontiers in Education

T2 - Frontiers in Education

JF - Frontiers in Education

SN - 2504-284X

M1 - 116

ER -