TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated verification of an audio-control protocol using Uppaal
AU - Bengtsson, Johan
AU - Griffioen, W.A. David
AU - Kristoffersen, Kåre J.
AU - Larsen, Kim G.
AU - Larsson, Fredrik
AU - Pettersson, Paul
AU - Yi, Wang
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - In this paper we present a case-study in which the tool Uppaal is extended and applied to verify an audio-control protocol developed by Philips. The size of the protocol studied in this paper is significantly larger than case studies, including various abstract versions of the same protocol without bus-collision handling, reported previously in the community of real-time verification. We have checked that the protocol will function correctly if the timing error of its components is bound to ±5%, and incorrectly if the error is ±6%. In addition, using Uppaal’s ability of generating diagnostic traces, we have studied an erroneous version of the protocol actually implemented by Philips, and constructed a possible execution sequence explaining the error. During the case-study, Uppaal was extended with the notion of committed locations. It allows for accurate modelling of atomic behaviours, and more importantly, it is utilised to guide the state-space exploration of the model checker to avoid exploring unnecessary interleavings of independent transitions. Our experimental results demonstrate considerable time and space-savings of the modified model checking algorithm. In fact, due to the huge time and memory-requirement, it was impossible to check a simple reachability property of the protocol before the introduction of committed locations, and now it takes only seconds.
AB - In this paper we present a case-study in which the tool Uppaal is extended and applied to verify an audio-control protocol developed by Philips. The size of the protocol studied in this paper is significantly larger than case studies, including various abstract versions of the same protocol without bus-collision handling, reported previously in the community of real-time verification. We have checked that the protocol will function correctly if the timing error of its components is bound to ±5%, and incorrectly if the error is ±6%. In addition, using Uppaal’s ability of generating diagnostic traces, we have studied an erroneous version of the protocol actually implemented by Philips, and constructed a possible execution sequence explaining the error. During the case-study, Uppaal was extended with the notion of committed locations. It allows for accurate modelling of atomic behaviours, and more importantly, it is utilised to guide the state-space exploration of the model checker to avoid exploring unnecessary interleavings of independent transitions. Our experimental results demonstrate considerable time and space-savings of the modified model checking algorithm. In fact, due to the huge time and memory-requirement, it was impossible to check a simple reachability property of the protocol before the introduction of committed locations, and now it takes only seconds.
U2 - 10.1016/S1567-8326(02)00036-X
DO - 10.1016/S1567-8326(02)00036-X
M3 - Article
SN - 1567-8326
VL - 52-53
SP - 163
EP - 181
JO - Journal of logic and algebraic programming
JF - Journal of logic and algebraic programming
ER -