Baseline PSMA PET/CT parameters predict overall survival and treatment response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

Fleur Kleiburg*, Lioe Fee de Geus-Oei, Romy Spijkerman, Wyanne A. Noortman, Floris H.P. van Velden, Srirang Manohar, Frits Smit, Frank A.J. Toonen, Saskia A.C. Luelmo, Tom van der Hulle, Linda Heijmen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with varying survival outcomes. This study investigated whether baseline PSMA PET/CT parameters are associated with survival and treatment response. Methods: Sixty mCRPC patients underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT before treatment with androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs) or chemotherapy. Intensity-based parameters, volumetric parameters, metastatic sites and DmaxVox (distance between the two outermost voxels) from baseline PSMA PET/CT were collected, as well as age, Gleason score and laboratory parameters. Cox regression analysis evaluated their prognostic value for overall survival (OS). Additionally, a preliminary lesion-level analysis was done (n = 241 lesions) with lesion location and twelve radiomic features selected from previous literature. Logistic regression evaluated their association with PSMA PET/CT-based lesion progression after 3–4 months of treatment. Results: Total tumour volume (PSMA-TV) (HR = 1.41 per doubling [1.17–1.70]), total lesion uptake (TL-PSMA) (HR = 1.40 per doubling [1.16–1.69]) and DmaxVox (HR = 1.31 per 10 cm increase [1.07–1.62]) were prognostic for OS, each independent of baseline PSA level (HR = 0.82 per doubling [0.68–0.98]), haemoglobin level (HR = 0.68 per mmol/L increase [0.49–0.95]) and line of treatment. On lesion-level, location (prostate vs bone OR = 0.23 [0.06–0.83]) and SUVmean (OR = 1.72 per doubling [1.08–2.75]) were independent prognostic markers for lesion progression, morphological and texture-based radiomic features were not. Conclusion: Baseline PSMA PET/CT scans have prognostic value in mCRPC patients and can potentially aid in treatment decision-making. DmaxVox can serve as a simpler alternative to PSMA-TV when automated segmentation software is not available. When combined with PSMA-TV, lower PSA levels indicated worse OS, which may be a marker of tumour dedifferentiation. Further research is needed to validate these models in larger patient cohorts. Key Points: Question mCRPC is a highly heterogeneous disease, requiring good prognostic markers. Findings PSMA-TV was the best independent prognostic marker for OS; maximum distance between lesions (DmaxVox) can be used as a simpler alternative. Clinical relevance Baseline PSMA PET/CT parameters representing tumour burden were independently associated with OS in mCRPC patients, providing prognostic insights for clinical decision-making. Although PSMA-TV was the best prognostic marker, DmaxVox can serve as an easier to obtain alternative.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4254
JournalEuropean radiology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print/First online - 22 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Prostatic neoplasms, Castration-resistant
  • PSMA-1007
  • Survival
  • Positron-emission tomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Baseline PSMA PET/CT parameters predict overall survival and treatment response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this