Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Behavior of e-HRM adoption: empirical evidence form organizations in developing context

  • Bandula Lanka Galhena

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Based on Theory of planned behavior (TPB) and diffusion of innovation theory (DIT), present study developed and empirically tested the integrated model of organizational e-HRM adoption. The model consists of four contextual variables such as innovation, individual, organizational and environmental. Data were collected from 212 firms in Sri Lanka by means self-administered questionnaire. Structural model was tested using Partial Least Square. Results indicate that innovation characteristics (relative advantage and compatibility), environmental characteristics (competition), organizational characteristics (top management support) significantly explain the organizational e-HRM adoption intention. Further, financial resource and top management support significantly determine the extent of operational e-HRM adoption. Moreover, IT expertise is significantly explained the extent of relational and transformational e-HRM adoption.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling
Subtitle of host publicationThe Conference for PLS Users
EditorsJörg Henseler, Christian Ringle, José Roldán, Gabriel Cepeda
Place of PublicationEnschede
PublisherUniversity of Twente
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9789036540568
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes
Event2015 PLS User Conference: 2nd International Symposium on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling - The Conference for PLS Users - Seville, Spain
Duration: 16 Jun 201519 Jun 2015

Conference

Conference2015 PLS User Conference
Country/TerritorySpain
CitySeville
Period16/06/1519/06/15

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Behavior of e-HRM adoption: empirical evidence form organizations in developing context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this