Benchmarking implementations of lazy functional languages

Pieter H. Hartel, K.G. Langendoen

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademicpeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)
    52 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Five implementations of different lazy functional languages are compared using a common benchmark of a dozen medium size programs. The benchmarking procedure has been designed such that one set of programs can be translated automatically into different languages, thus allowing a fair comparison of the quality of compilers for different lazy functional languages. Aspects studied include compile time, execution time, ease of programmingdetermined by the availability of certain key features
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages341-349
    Number of pages9
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 1993

    Keywords

    • IR-55741
    • EWI-1194

    Cite this

    @conference{0653b37b2f7f414caa5e9f5a29ab653b,
    title = "Benchmarking implementations of lazy functional languages",
    abstract = "Five implementations of different lazy functional languages are compared using a common benchmark of a dozen medium size programs. The benchmarking procedure has been designed such that one set of programs can be translated automatically into different languages, thus allowing a fair comparison of the quality of compilers for different lazy functional languages. Aspects studied include compile time, execution time, ease of programmingdetermined by the availability of certain key features",
    keywords = "IR-55741, EWI-1194",
    author = "Hartel, {Pieter H.} and K.G. Langendoen",
    note = "Imported from DIES",
    year = "1993",
    month = "6",
    language = "Undefined",
    pages = "341--349",

    }

    Benchmarking implementations of lazy functional languages. / Hartel, Pieter H.; Langendoen, K.G.

    1993. 341-349.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademicpeer-review

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Benchmarking implementations of lazy functional languages

    AU - Hartel, Pieter H.

    AU - Langendoen, K.G.

    N1 - Imported from DIES

    PY - 1993/6

    Y1 - 1993/6

    N2 - Five implementations of different lazy functional languages are compared using a common benchmark of a dozen medium size programs. The benchmarking procedure has been designed such that one set of programs can be translated automatically into different languages, thus allowing a fair comparison of the quality of compilers for different lazy functional languages. Aspects studied include compile time, execution time, ease of programmingdetermined by the availability of certain key features

    AB - Five implementations of different lazy functional languages are compared using a common benchmark of a dozen medium size programs. The benchmarking procedure has been designed such that one set of programs can be translated automatically into different languages, thus allowing a fair comparison of the quality of compilers for different lazy functional languages. Aspects studied include compile time, execution time, ease of programmingdetermined by the availability of certain key features

    KW - IR-55741

    KW - EWI-1194

    M3 - Paper

    SP - 341

    EP - 349

    ER -