Between bargaining and deliberation: decision-making in the Council of the European Union

Andreas Warntjen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Council of the European Union (EU) is a crucial actor in EU legislative decision-making. However, how it reaches decisions is subject to considerable debate. Constructivists argue that the dominant mode is norm-guided behaviour and deliberation, pointing to the informal 'culture of consensus'. Scholars working in a rational choice tradition assume that member states strive to maximize their utility and move outcomes as close as possible to their ideal positions, either by using their power in bargaining or by arranging beneficial exchanges of votes. Several bargaining and exchange models have been advanced by this literature. This contribution explores the logics underlying these different conceptualizations of negotiations in the Council of the EU. Furthermore, it discusses the interpretation of the existing empirical results and tasks for future research. Due to observational equivalence empirical findings are often inconclusive.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)665-679
JournalJournal of European public policy
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • IR-73537
  • METIS-267290

Cite this

@article{f546cd7fdc1c42159f02e9b8d0645c97,
title = "Between bargaining and deliberation: decision-making in the Council of the European Union",
abstract = "The Council of the European Union (EU) is a crucial actor in EU legislative decision-making. However, how it reaches decisions is subject to considerable debate. Constructivists argue that the dominant mode is norm-guided behaviour and deliberation, pointing to the informal 'culture of consensus'. Scholars working in a rational choice tradition assume that member states strive to maximize their utility and move outcomes as close as possible to their ideal positions, either by using their power in bargaining or by arranging beneficial exchanges of votes. Several bargaining and exchange models have been advanced by this literature. This contribution explores the logics underlying these different conceptualizations of negotiations in the Council of the EU. Furthermore, it discusses the interpretation of the existing empirical results and tasks for future research. Due to observational equivalence empirical findings are often inconclusive.",
keywords = "IR-73537, METIS-267290",
author = "Andreas Warntjen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/13501761003748641",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "17",
pages = "665--679",
journal = "Journal of European public policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Between bargaining and deliberation: decision-making in the Council of the European Union. / Warntjen, Andreas.

In: Journal of European public policy, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2010, p. 665-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between bargaining and deliberation: decision-making in the Council of the European Union

AU - Warntjen, Andreas

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The Council of the European Union (EU) is a crucial actor in EU legislative decision-making. However, how it reaches decisions is subject to considerable debate. Constructivists argue that the dominant mode is norm-guided behaviour and deliberation, pointing to the informal 'culture of consensus'. Scholars working in a rational choice tradition assume that member states strive to maximize their utility and move outcomes as close as possible to their ideal positions, either by using their power in bargaining or by arranging beneficial exchanges of votes. Several bargaining and exchange models have been advanced by this literature. This contribution explores the logics underlying these different conceptualizations of negotiations in the Council of the EU. Furthermore, it discusses the interpretation of the existing empirical results and tasks for future research. Due to observational equivalence empirical findings are often inconclusive.

AB - The Council of the European Union (EU) is a crucial actor in EU legislative decision-making. However, how it reaches decisions is subject to considerable debate. Constructivists argue that the dominant mode is norm-guided behaviour and deliberation, pointing to the informal 'culture of consensus'. Scholars working in a rational choice tradition assume that member states strive to maximize their utility and move outcomes as close as possible to their ideal positions, either by using their power in bargaining or by arranging beneficial exchanges of votes. Several bargaining and exchange models have been advanced by this literature. This contribution explores the logics underlying these different conceptualizations of negotiations in the Council of the EU. Furthermore, it discusses the interpretation of the existing empirical results and tasks for future research. Due to observational equivalence empirical findings are often inconclusive.

KW - IR-73537

KW - METIS-267290

U2 - 10.1080/13501761003748641

DO - 10.1080/13501761003748641

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 665

EP - 679

JO - Journal of European public policy

JF - Journal of European public policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 5

ER -