Between quality and control: what can we learn from higher education quality assurance policy in the Netherlands

Aijing Chu (Corresponding Author), Don F. Westerheijden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Among pioneering European countries who started to establish a formal higher education quality assurance system in the 1980s, the Netherlands adopted one based on peer review and quality enhancement, which was replaced in 2003 by an accountability-oriented accreditation system under the substantial influence of the Bologna Process. Recently, the emphasis is being put on institutional audit to restore a culture of quality within higher education institutions. This article addresses the question of what the higher education worldwide can learn from the evolution of Dutch quality assurance policy concerning control, the balance between accountability and quality improvement and trust. Finally, recent adaptations to the current, third, round of accreditation are also addressed in this context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-270
Number of pages11
JournalQuality in higher education
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

quality assurance
Netherlands
accreditation
Bologna Process
education
responsibility
peer review
audit

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • higher education quality assurance
  • programme accreditation
  • quality culture
  • quality improvement
  • The Netherlands
  • accountability

Cite this

@article{e964698a2efb4be0bbd99db48a90a153,
title = "Between quality and control: what can we learn from higher education quality assurance policy in the Netherlands",
abstract = "Among pioneering European countries who started to establish a formal higher education quality assurance system in the 1980s, the Netherlands adopted one based on peer review and quality enhancement, which was replaced in 2003 by an accountability-oriented accreditation system under the substantial influence of the Bologna Process. Recently, the emphasis is being put on institutional audit to restore a culture of quality within higher education institutions. This article addresses the question of what the higher education worldwide can learn from the evolution of Dutch quality assurance policy concerning control, the balance between accountability and quality improvement and trust. Finally, recent adaptations to the current, third, round of accreditation are also addressed in this context.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, higher education quality assurance, programme accreditation, quality culture, quality improvement, The Netherlands, accountability",
author = "Aijing Chu and Westerheijden, {Don F.}",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1080/13538322.2018.1559513",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "260--270",
journal = "Quality in higher education",
issn = "1353-8322",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Between quality and control : what can we learn from higher education quality assurance policy in the Netherlands. / Chu, Aijing (Corresponding Author); Westerheijden, Don F.

In: Quality in higher education, Vol. 24, No. 3, 11.01.2019, p. 260-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between quality and control

T2 - what can we learn from higher education quality assurance policy in the Netherlands

AU - Chu, Aijing

AU - Westerheijden, Don F.

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2019/1/11

Y1 - 2019/1/11

N2 - Among pioneering European countries who started to establish a formal higher education quality assurance system in the 1980s, the Netherlands adopted one based on peer review and quality enhancement, which was replaced in 2003 by an accountability-oriented accreditation system under the substantial influence of the Bologna Process. Recently, the emphasis is being put on institutional audit to restore a culture of quality within higher education institutions. This article addresses the question of what the higher education worldwide can learn from the evolution of Dutch quality assurance policy concerning control, the balance between accountability and quality improvement and trust. Finally, recent adaptations to the current, third, round of accreditation are also addressed in this context.

AB - Among pioneering European countries who started to establish a formal higher education quality assurance system in the 1980s, the Netherlands adopted one based on peer review and quality enhancement, which was replaced in 2003 by an accountability-oriented accreditation system under the substantial influence of the Bologna Process. Recently, the emphasis is being put on institutional audit to restore a culture of quality within higher education institutions. This article addresses the question of what the higher education worldwide can learn from the evolution of Dutch quality assurance policy concerning control, the balance between accountability and quality improvement and trust. Finally, recent adaptations to the current, third, round of accreditation are also addressed in this context.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - higher education quality assurance

KW - programme accreditation

KW - quality culture

KW - quality improvement

KW - The Netherlands

KW - accountability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060061952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13538322.2018.1559513

DO - 10.1080/13538322.2018.1559513

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 260

EP - 270

JO - Quality in higher education

JF - Quality in higher education

SN - 1353-8322

IS - 3

ER -