Between Rigour and Regional Relevance? Conceptualising Tensions in University Engagement for Socio-Economic Development

Paul Benneworth, Mitchell Young, Roger Normann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Universities should place delivering societal benefits centrally within their strategic decision-making. But this comes at a time when universities face extensive pressures to transform every aspect of their institutional existence, raising questions about whether the third mission can ever truly be a strategic objective for higher education. To understand this tension, this paper explores the ways in which national higher education policies frame the strategic latitude that universities enjoy to engage with regional partners in teaching and research activities. Presenting case studies from the Czech Republic and Norway, the paper reveals that the space for regional engagement is squeezed at every stage as universities seek to implement national directives whilst remaining true to their regional roots. We conclude by arguing better understanding the regional mission requires better understanding the processes by which regional engagement is framed as un-prestigious by wider policy fields.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-462
Number of pages20
JournalHigher education policy
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • civic universities
  • policy tensions
  • regional engagement
  • strategic management
  • third mission

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Between Rigour and Regional Relevance? Conceptualising Tensions in University Engagement for Socio-Economic Development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this