Abstract
Design-use relations are complex: architects influence social outcomes through design without having control over them. Making this complexity explicit during design is important, but difficult. Promising is work on human-technology relations in science and technology studies (STS) and philosophy of technology. With an eye to connecting this theoretical work to design practice, we study what architects already do: how design-use complexities figure during design processes and how architects deal with them. Based on a case study of the design competition for a new media building, we show two lines of reasoning in architects’ anticipation of use: specificity and openness. In doing so, we aim to provide insight into when, where and why they can benefit from STS and philosophical theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 54-81 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Design studies |
| Volume | 66 |
| Early online date | 25 Jan 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2020 |
Keywords
- case study
- design knowledge
- design process
- design-use relations
- architectural design
- 22/2 OA procedure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Between specificity and openness: How architects deal with design-use complexities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver