Abstract
While the European Parliament currently plays an important role in the European legislative process, it is not yet involved in the decision making process on the implementation of measures. The Council still plays a dominant role at this stage of the European policy making process. Based on the current decision making procedures, which are commonly known as ‘comitology’, the Council and thereby the member states are allowed to review the Commission’s execution of Community acts. In this chapter we propose and analyze two alternative implementation procedures, which may strengthen the role of Parliament. The policies which these procedures may produce are compared with those of current procedures. Moreover, we show how the institutional balance in the Union would change if the alternative procedures were implemented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 87-112 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Aussenwirtschaft |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | I/II |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond comitology: a comparative analysis of implementation procedures with parliamentary Involvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Chapter
-
Beyond comitology: a comparative analysis of implementation procedures with parliamentary Involvement
Steunenberg, B., Koboldt, C. & Schmidtchen, D., 2000, Decision Rules in the European Union: A Rational Choice Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 72-102Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver