Abstract
The biosphere functional integrity boundary is that 20-25% of every square kilometre of managed lands should be reserved for nature. This paper assesses what the implications and challenges of implementing this boundary are. We use Earth System Justice (ESJ), content analysis of relevant multi-level policy documents, and case studies in Rotterdam and Lagos. We conclude that the concept of ESJ can be improved by taking data injustice, context, and materialities/timescales into account. From urban scholarship we learn that greening leads to gentrification (rising prices, displacement, inequality), could be countered by the every square km emphasis. Rotterdam is close to achieving this boundary, but there are still risks of gentrification, inequitable access, and poor quality green. In Lagos, greening is in rich areas and greening policy competes with development needs. We conclude that the Earth Commission’s safe and just target needs to be justly implemented to avoid gentrification and complement development.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Social Science Research Network (SSRN) |
| Number of pages | 50 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- biodiversity
- Gentrification
- Social inequalities
- Earth System Boundaries
- Earth System Justice
- Urban greening
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Biosphere functional integrity boundary and cities: Comparing Rotterdam and Lagos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver