Bridging the chasm? Exploring the Effect of the University Context on Knowledge Exchange

Rhoda Ahoba-Sam*, Andrea Caputo, David Charles, Rebecca Herron

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Working paper

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper provides evidence of the importance of the university context in the facilitation of academic engagement. We conceptualise universities as important actors in the innovation process, and academic engagement as encompassing knowledge-related activities occurring within and outside the university, i.e. those involving both internal and external stakeholders. Universities have increasingly been seen to engage with their communities, or at least show much interest in third mission activities. Universities have, in some cases, put on a cloak of entrepreneurship and have essentially introduced the market into academia. Academic scientists have also had to be more entrepreneurial. However, too often, a chasm is evident between the institutional efforts and the individual efforts identified – universities’ engagement efforts may not always consolidate the efforts of individual academics who could be considered the actual conduits for knowledge exchange. In fact, several studies have reported that academic scientists frequently engage outside their institutions with little or no direct assistance from their universities. In our view, this has implications on the ability of universities to facilitate knowledge exchange processes. Based on 39 interviews from Sweden and the UK, we argue that enhanced management of knowledge exchange processes is imperative for facilitating knowledge exchange. Our findings have implications for university management.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameRUNIN Working Paper Series
No.01
Volume2020
ISSN (Electronic)2535-5686

Fingerprint

university
knowledge
management
entrepreneurship
Sweden
assistance
stakeholder
innovation
market
ability
interview
community
evidence

Cite this

Ahoba-Sam, R., Caputo, A., Charles, D., & Herron, R. (2020). Bridging the chasm? Exploring the Effect of the University Context on Knowledge Exchange. (RUNIN Working Paper Series; Vol. 2020, No. 01). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2535-5686.2020.01
Ahoba-Sam, Rhoda ; Caputo, Andrea ; Charles, David ; Herron, Rebecca. / Bridging the chasm? Exploring the Effect of the University Context on Knowledge Exchange. 2020. (RUNIN Working Paper Series; 01).
@techreport{414ed80b80204e16b39d98423a771811,
title = "Bridging the chasm?: Exploring the Effect of the University Context on Knowledge Exchange",
abstract = "This paper provides evidence of the importance of the university context in the facilitation of academic engagement. We conceptualise universities as important actors in the innovation process, and academic engagement as encompassing knowledge-related activities occurring within and outside the university, i.e. those involving both internal and external stakeholders. Universities have increasingly been seen to engage with their communities, or at least show much interest in third mission activities. Universities have, in some cases, put on a cloak of entrepreneurship and have essentially introduced the market into academia. Academic scientists have also had to be more entrepreneurial. However, too often, a chasm is evident between the institutional efforts and the individual efforts identified – universities’ engagement efforts may not always consolidate the efforts of individual academics who could be considered the actual conduits for knowledge exchange. In fact, several studies have reported that academic scientists frequently engage outside their institutions with little or no direct assistance from their universities. In our view, this has implications on the ability of universities to facilitate knowledge exchange processes. Based on 39 interviews from Sweden and the UK, we argue that enhanced management of knowledge exchange processes is imperative for facilitating knowledge exchange. Our findings have implications for university management.",
author = "Rhoda Ahoba-Sam and Andrea Caputo and David Charles and Rebecca Herron",
note = "Subseries of the CHEPS working paper series as part of the UT & ECIU RUNIN Ph.D. training network. Paul Benneworth is the series editor This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 722295 This paper was presented at the 5th Master Class on EU Cohesion Policy, which was held in Brussels, Belgium on October 8th-12th 2017, as part of the 15th European Week of Regions and Cities.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3990/4.2535-5686.2020.01",
language = "English",
series = "RUNIN Working Paper Series",
number = "01",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Ahoba-Sam, R, Caputo, A, Charles, D & Herron, R 2020 'Bridging the chasm? Exploring the Effect of the University Context on Knowledge Exchange' RUNIN Working Paper Series, no. 01, vol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2535-5686.2020.01

Bridging the chasm? Exploring the Effect of the University Context on Knowledge Exchange. / Ahoba-Sam, Rhoda; Caputo, Andrea; Charles, David; Herron, Rebecca.

2020. (RUNIN Working Paper Series; Vol. 2020, No. 01).

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Bridging the chasm?

T2 - Exploring the Effect of the University Context on Knowledge Exchange

AU - Ahoba-Sam, Rhoda

AU - Caputo, Andrea

AU - Charles, David

AU - Herron, Rebecca

N1 - Subseries of the CHEPS working paper series as part of the UT & ECIU RUNIN Ph.D. training network. Paul Benneworth is the series editor This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 722295 This paper was presented at the 5th Master Class on EU Cohesion Policy, which was held in Brussels, Belgium on October 8th-12th 2017, as part of the 15th European Week of Regions and Cities.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This paper provides evidence of the importance of the university context in the facilitation of academic engagement. We conceptualise universities as important actors in the innovation process, and academic engagement as encompassing knowledge-related activities occurring within and outside the university, i.e. those involving both internal and external stakeholders. Universities have increasingly been seen to engage with their communities, or at least show much interest in third mission activities. Universities have, in some cases, put on a cloak of entrepreneurship and have essentially introduced the market into academia. Academic scientists have also had to be more entrepreneurial. However, too often, a chasm is evident between the institutional efforts and the individual efforts identified – universities’ engagement efforts may not always consolidate the efforts of individual academics who could be considered the actual conduits for knowledge exchange. In fact, several studies have reported that academic scientists frequently engage outside their institutions with little or no direct assistance from their universities. In our view, this has implications on the ability of universities to facilitate knowledge exchange processes. Based on 39 interviews from Sweden and the UK, we argue that enhanced management of knowledge exchange processes is imperative for facilitating knowledge exchange. Our findings have implications for university management.

AB - This paper provides evidence of the importance of the university context in the facilitation of academic engagement. We conceptualise universities as important actors in the innovation process, and academic engagement as encompassing knowledge-related activities occurring within and outside the university, i.e. those involving both internal and external stakeholders. Universities have increasingly been seen to engage with their communities, or at least show much interest in third mission activities. Universities have, in some cases, put on a cloak of entrepreneurship and have essentially introduced the market into academia. Academic scientists have also had to be more entrepreneurial. However, too often, a chasm is evident between the institutional efforts and the individual efforts identified – universities’ engagement efforts may not always consolidate the efforts of individual academics who could be considered the actual conduits for knowledge exchange. In fact, several studies have reported that academic scientists frequently engage outside their institutions with little or no direct assistance from their universities. In our view, this has implications on the ability of universities to facilitate knowledge exchange processes. Based on 39 interviews from Sweden and the UK, we argue that enhanced management of knowledge exchange processes is imperative for facilitating knowledge exchange. Our findings have implications for university management.

U2 - 10.3990/4.2535-5686.2020.01

DO - 10.3990/4.2535-5686.2020.01

M3 - Working paper

T3 - RUNIN Working Paper Series

BT - Bridging the chasm?

ER -